چرا زنان بیشتری در علم نیستند؟: پژوهشگران برتر شواهد را بررسی میکنند
Why aren't more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence.
معرفی کتاب «چرا زنان بیشتری در علم نیستند؟: پژوهشگران برتر شواهد را بررسی میکنند» (با عنوان لاتین Why aren't more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence.) نوشتهٔ edited by Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams، منتشرشده توسط نشر American Psychological Association (APA) در سال 2007. این کتاب در فرمت pdf، زبان انگلیسی ارائه شده است.
Why aren't more women pursuing careers in science, engineering, and math? Is the lack of women in these fields a consequence of societal discouragements, innate differences in ability between the sexes, or differences in aspirations? These questions always spark a host of other questions--and a multiplicity of answers--all of which have important implications for gender equality and for retaining the nation's competitiveness in the technological marketplace. The most reliable and current knowledge about women's participation in science is presented in this collection of fifteen essays written by top researchers on gender differences in ability. The essayists were chosen to reflect the diversity and complexity of views on the topic, about which knowledge has been accumulating and evolving for decades. The editors provide an introduction that defines the key issues and embeds them in historical context and a conclusion that synthesizes and integrates the disparate views. Written accessibly to appeal to students and non-specialists as well as psychologists and other social scientists, the contributors reframe this key controversy and challenge readers' emotional and political biases through solid empirical science. Taken together, the introduction, essays, and conclusion make a convincing case that sex differences are neither as unambiguous as earlier researchers suggested nor as insubstantial as some current critics claim. Sex differences in career choices are definitely not inevitable, as the past thirty years have documented both a sea change in the gender makeup of various fields and fluctuations in ability-score differences between the sexes. However, as the essays make clear, such changes leave open the possibility of cultural and biological bases for today's sex differences in science, engineering, and math participation. "Why aren't more women pursuing careers in science, engineering, and math? Is the lack of women in these fields a consequence of societal discouragements, innate differences in ability between the sexes, or differences in aspirations? These questions always spark a host of other questions--and a multiplicity of answers--all of which have important implications for gender equality and for retaining the nation's competitiveness in the technological marketplace. The most reliable and current knowledge about women's participation in science is presented in this collection of 15 essays written by top researchers on gender differences in ability. The contributors were chosen to reflect the diversity and complexity of views on the topic, about which knowledge has been accumulating and evolving for decades. The editors provide an introduction that defines the key issues and embeds them in historical context and a conclusion that synthesizes and integrates the disparate views. Taken together, the book makes a convincing case that sex differences are neither as unambiguous as earlier researchers suggested nor as insubstantial as some current critics claim. Sex differences in career choices are definitely not inevitable, as the past 30 years have documented both a sea change in the gender makeup of various fields and fluctuations in ability-score differences between the sexes. However, as the essays make clear, such changes leave open the possibility of cultural and biological bases for today's sex differences in science, engineering, and math participation. Written to appeal to students and nonspecialists as well as psychologists and other social scientists, the contributors reframe this key controversy and challenge readers' emotional and political biases through solid empirical science"--Jacket. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved) cover.jpg 1 200622337-FRM.pdf 2 200622337-001.pdf 19 200622337-002.pdf 40 200622337-003.pdf 51 200622337-004.pdf 59 200622337-005.pdf 68 200622337-006.pdf 79 200622337-007.pdf 88 200622337-008.pdf 110 200622337-009.pdf 122 200622337-010.pdf 129 200622337-011.pdf 139 200622337-012.pdf 154 200622337-013.pdf 165 200622337-014.pdf 179 200622337-015.pdf 195 200622337-016.pdf 205 200622337-017.pdf 217 200622337-BKM.pdf 241 Why aren't more women pursuing careers in science, engineering, and maths? Is the lack of women in these fields a consequence of societal discouragements, innate differences in ability between the sexes, or differences in aspirations? This book contains essays that talk about women's participation in science
دانلود کتاب چرا زنان بیشتری در علم نیستند؟: پژوهشگران برتر شواهد را بررسی میکنند