Wesley and the Anglicans : Political Division in Early Evangelicalism

Why did the Wesleyan Methodists and the Anglican evangelicals divide during the middle of the eighteenth century? Many would argue that the division between them was based narrowly on theological matters, especially predestination and perfection. Ryan Danker suggests, however, that politics was a major factor throughout, driving the Wesleyan Methodists and Anglican evangelicals apart. Methodism was perceived to be linked with the radical and seditious politics of the Cromwellian period. This was a charged claim in a post-Restoration England. Likewise Danker explores the political force of resurgent Tory influence under George III, which exerted more pressure on evangelicals to prove their loyalty to the Establishment. These political realities made it hard for evangelicals in the Church of England to cooperate with Wesley and meant that all their theological debates were politically inflected. Rich in detail, here is a book for all who seek deeper insight into a critical juncture in the development of evangelicalism and early Methodism. Identity and challenge: defining early English evangelicalism Movement and conversion: Wesley in the trans-atlantic revival Propaganda and power: the revival under fire Politics and polity: Methodist structure and the question of dissent Enclaves and incursions: the geography of evangelicalism Eucharist and ethos: the formation of Methodist identity Hegemony and casualties: the Oxford expulsions of 1768 Vision and divergence: a new Anglican historiography Constrained to deviate. Why did the Wesleyan Methodists and the Anglican evangelicals divide during the middle of the eighteenth century? Many say it was based narrowly on theological matters. Ryan Nicholas Danker suggests that politics was a major factor driving them apart. Rich in detail, this study offers deep insight into a critical juncture in evangelicalism and early Methodism.