Warships after Washington : the development of the five major fleets, 1922-1930

The Washington Treaty of 1922, a watershed event designed to head off a potentially dangerous arms race between the major naval powers, agreed to legally binding limits on the numbers and sizes of principal warship types, effectively banning the construction of new battleships for a decade. Warships After Washington is unique in its coverage of the political and strategic background of the treaty with analysis of exactly how the navies of Britain, the USA , Japan, France, and Italy responded. For the first time, warship enthusiasts and historians can understand fully the rationale behind much of inter-war naval procurement. About the Author John Jordan is the editor of the Warship annual and a lifelong student of French naval history on which he has written extensively. Publisher: Seaforth Publishing (November 21, 2011) The Washington Treaty of 1922, designed to head off a potentially dangerous arms race between the major naval powers, agreed to legally binding limits on the numbers and sizes of the principal warship types. In doing so, it introduced a new element of constrain into naval architecture and sponsored many ingenious attempts to maximise the power of ships built within hose restrictions. It effectively banned the construction of new battleships for a decade, but threw greater emphasis on large cruisers. This much is broadly understood by anyone with an interest in warships but both the wider context of the treaty and the detail ramifications of its provisions are little understood. The approach of this book is novel in combining coverage of the political and strategic background of the treaty - and the subsequent London Treaty of 1930 - with analysis of exactly how the navies of Britain, the USA, Japan, France and Italy responded, in terms of types of warships they built and the precise characteristics of those designs. This was not just a matter of capital ships, carriers and cruisers, but also influenced the development of super-destroyers and large submarines. Now for the first time warship enthusiasts and historians can understand fully the rationale behind much of inter-war naval procurement. The Washington Treaty was a watershed, and this book provides an important insight into its full significance. The Washington Treaty Of 1922, Designed To Head Off A Potentially Dangerous Arms Race Between The Major Naval Powers, Agreed To Legally Binding Limits On The Numbers And Sizes Of The Principal Warship Types. In Doing So, It Introduced A New Constraint Into Naval Architecture And Sponsored Many Ingenious Attempts To Maximise The Power Of Ships Built Within Those Restrictions. It Effectively Banned The Construction Of New Battleships For A Decade, But Threw Greater Emphasis On Large Cruisers.rn This Much Is Broadly Understood By Anyone With An Interest In Warships, But Both The Wider Context Of The Treaty And The Detail Ramifications Of Its Provisions Are Little Understood. The Approach Of This Book Is Novel In Combining Coverage Of The Political And Strategic Background Of The Treaty – And The Subsequent London Treaty Of 1930 – With Analysis Of Exactly How The Navies Of Britain, The Usa, Japan, France And Italy Responded, In Terms Of The Types Of Warships They Built And The Precise Characteristics Of Those Designs. This Was Not Just A Matter Of Capital Ships And Cruisers, But Also Influenced The Development Of Super-destroyers And Large Submarines.rn Now For The First Time Warship Enthusiasts And Historians Can Understand Fully The Rationale Behind Much Of Inter-war Naval Procurement. The Washington Treaty Was A Watershed, And This Book Provides An Important Insight Into Its Full Significance. This fascinating study of post-WWI naval powers reveals how international peace treaties influenced the design and engineering of modern warships. The Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 was designed to prevent an arms race between the major naval powers after the First World War. But the new constraint inspired ingenious attempts to maximize the power of ships built within the treaty's restrictions. By effectively banning the construction of new battleships for a decade, the signatories shifted their focus to the design and construction of large cruisers. In Warships After Washington , naval historian John Jordan examines the political and strategic background of the Washington Naval Treaty and the subsequent London Treaty of 1930. He then presents a detailed study of the types of warships built by the navies of Britain, the USA, Japan, France. The treaties influenced naval engineering across the board—from the development of capital ships and cruisers to super-destroyers, aircraft carriers, and large submarines. The Washington Treaty of 1922, a watershed event designed to head off a potentially dangerous arms race between the major naval powers, agreed to legally binding limits on the numbers and sizes of principal warship types, effectively banning the construction of new battleships for a decade. WARSHIPS AFTER WASHINGTON is unique in its coverage of the political and strategic background of the treaty with analysis of exactly how the navies of Britain, the USA, Japan, France, and Italy responded. For the first time, warship enthusiasts and historians can understand fully the rationale behind much of inter-war naval procurement. Show More Show Less