University, court, and slave : pro-slavery academic thought and southern jurisprudence, 1831-1861

'University, Court, and Slave' reveals long-forgotten connections between universities and pro-slavery thought. Proslavery faculty wrote about the economic and historical importance of slavery and helped shape a proslavery jurisprudence that made it harder to free slaves and pushed the South towards Civil War. Abstract: 'University, Court, and Slave' reveals long-forgotten connections between universities and pro-slavery thought. Proslavery faculty wrote about the economic and historical importance of slavery and helped shape a proslavery jurisprudence that made it harder to free slaves and pushed the South towards Civil War This Book Reveals Long-forgotten Connections Between Pre-civil War Southern Universities And Slavery. Universities And Their Faculty Owned People-sometimes Dozens Of People-and Profited From Their Labor While Many Slaves Endured Physical Abuse On Campuses. The Profits Of Enslaved Labor Helped Pay For Education, And Faculty And Students At Times Actively Promoted The Institution. They Wrote About The History Of Slavery, Argued For Its Central Role In The Southern Economy, And Developed A Political Theory That Justified Slavery. The University Faculty Spoke A Common Language Of Economic Utility, History, And Philosophy With Those Who Made The Laws For The Southern States. Their Extensive Writing Promoting Slavery Helps Us Understand How Southern Politicians And Judges Thought About The Practice. As Alfred L. Brophy Shows, Southern Universities Fought The Emancipation Movement For Economic Reasons, But Used History, Philosophy, And Law In An Attempt To Justify Their Position. The Combination Of Economic Reasoning And Historical Precedent Helped Shape A Southern, Proslavery Jurisprudence. Bolstered By The Courts, Academics Took Their Case To The Southern Public-and Ultimately To The Battlefield-to Defend Slavery. A Path-breaking And Deeply Researched History Of Southern Universities' Investment In And Defense Of Slavery, This Book Will Fundamentally Transform Our Understanding Of The Institutional Foundations Of Pro-slavery Thought. -- Book Jacket And Publisher's Website. The Rebel And The Professor : Nat Turner And Thomas Roderick Dew And The Utility Of Slavery -- Pro-slavery Academic Thought In The 1840s And 1850s -- The Southern Scholar -- Brown University's President Confronts Slavery -- The Chancellor, The Slave, And The Student -- The Fugitive Slave Act Of 1850 : The Grammar Of Pro-slavery Thought -- The Novelist And The Jurist : Harriet Beecher Stowe's Jurisprudence Of Sentiment -- Beyond State V. Mann : Thomas Ruffin's Jurisprudence -- Joseph Henry Lumpkin : Industrialism And Slavery In The Old South -- Pro-slavery Jurisprudence : Thomas Reade Roots Cobb's An Inquiry Into The Law Of Negro Slavery -- The Dictate Of A Wise Policy : Judicial Opposition To Freedom -- Slavery, Property, And Constitutionalism In The Secession Debates. Alfred L. Brophy. Includes Bibliographical References (pages 297-361) And Index. University, Court, and Slave reveals long-forgotten connections between pre-Civil War southern universities and slavery. Universities and their faculty owned people-sometimes dozens of people-and profited from their labor while many slaves endured physical abuse on campuses. The profits of enslaved labor helped pay for education, and faculty and students at times actively promoted the institution. They wrote about the history of slavery, argued for its central role in the southern economy, and developed a political theory that justified slavery. The university faculty spoke a common language of economic utility, history, and philosophy with those who made the laws for the southern states. Their extensive writing promoting slavery helps us understand how southern politicians and judges thought about the practice. As Alfred L. Brophy shows, southern universities fought the emancipation movement for economic reasons, but used history, philosophy, and law in an attempt to justify their position. Indeed, as the antislavery movement gained momentum, southern academics and their allies in the courts became bolder in their claims. Some went so far as to say that slavery was supported by natural law. The combination of economic reasoning and historical precedent helped shape a southern, proslavery jurisprudence. Following Lincoln's November 1860 election, southern academics joined politicians, judges, lawyers, and other leaders in arguing that their economy and society was threatened. Southern jurisprudence led them to believe that any threats to slavery and property justified secession. Bolstered by the courts, academics took their case to the southern public-and ultimately to the battlefield-to defend slavery. A path-breaking and deeply researched history of southern universities' investment in and defense of slavery, University, Court, and Slave will fundamentally transform our understanding of the institutional foundations of pro-slavery thought. University, Court, and Slave reveals long-forgotten connections between pre-Civil War southern universities and slavery. Universities and their faculty owned people-sometimes dozens of people-and profited from their labor while many slaves endured physical abuse on campuses. As Alfred L. Brophy shows, southern universities fought the emancipation movement for economic reasons, but used their writings on history, philosophy, and law in an attempt to justify their position and promote their institutions. Indeed, as the antislavery movement gained momentum, southern academics and their allies in the courts became bolder in their claims. Some went so far as to say that slavery was supported by natural law. The combination of economic reasoning and historical precedent helped shape a southern, pro-slavery jurisprudence. Following Lincoln's November 1860 election, southern academics joined politicians, judges, lawyers, and other leaders in arguing that their economy and society was threatened. Southern jurisprudence led them to believe that any threats to slavery and property justified secession. Bolstered by the courts, academics took their case to the southern public-and ultimately to the battlefield-to defend slavery. A path-breaking and deeply researched history of southern universities'investment in and defense of slavery, University, Court, and Slave will fundamentally transform our understanding of the institutional foundations pro-slavery thought.