Training Another Man's Wife: - The Complete Series

A provocative case for the inherently political nature of language In The Politics of Language , David Beaver and Jason Stanley present a radical new approach to the theory of meaning, offering an account of communication in which political and social identity, affect, and shared practices play as important a role as information. This new view of language, they argue, has dramatic consequences for free speech, democracy, and a range of other areas in which speech plays a central role. Drawing on a wealth of disciplines, The Politics of Language argues that the function of speech--whether in dialogue, larger group interactions, or mass communication--is to attune people to something, be it a shared reality, emotion, or identity. Reconceptualizing the central concepts of pragmatics and semantics, Beaver and Stanley apply their account to a range of phenomena that defy standard frameworks in linguistics and philosophy of language--from dog whistles and covert persuasion to echo chambers and genocidal speech. The authors use their framework to show that speech is inevitably political because all communication is imbued with the resonances of particular ideologies and their normative perspectives on reality. At a time when democracy is under attack, authoritarianism is on the rise, and diversity and equality are being demanded, The Politics of Language offers a powerful new vision of the language of politics, ideology, and protest. Copyright Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Harmful Speech Hustle The Path Forward Part I. How Words Connect People 1. Resonance 1.1. Let Freedom Ring 1.2. What’s in a Word? 1.3. The Scholarship of Resonance 1.4. Associative Resonance 1.5. Revelations 1.6. Interactional Expressives as Moves in a Game 1.7. Differentiating Kaplanian Expressive Meaning from Resonance 1.8. Which Contexts Count? 2. Attunement 2.1. You Must Remember This 2.2. Individual Attunement 2.3. Attunement to Practice 2.4. Collective Attunement and Common Ground 2.5. Attunement to Resonance 2.6. Changing Ideology 3. Harmony 3.1. Comprehension in the Content-Delivery Model 3.2. Cognitive Dissonance 3.3. Nondeliberative Uptake 3.4. Individual Harmony 3.5. Narrative Harmonization 3.6. Priming Hate 3.7. Mass Coordination 3.8. Collective Harmony 3.9. What Resonates and Why 3.10. Conclusion Part II. Presupposition and Ideology 4. The Psychology of Presupposition 4.1. Common Ground and Common Enemies 4.2. A Collision of Language and Psychology 4.3. Valence Framing 4.4. Marking Our Common Ground 5. Presupposing Practice 5.1. What More Do We Need from a Theory of Resonance? 5.2. Presuppositional Resonance 5.3. Conventional Meaning 5.4. Projection 5.5. Categoricity 5.6. What Else Is Missing? 6. On Parole 6.1. Vox Populi 6.2. Accommodation as Harmonization 6.3. Beyond Scorekeeping 6.4. Tuning In to Others 6.5. Marching to Your Own Drum 6.6. Echo Chambers Part III. Idealization 7. Neutrality 7.1. A Neutral Space for Reasons? 7.2. Frege on Sense versus Tone 7.3 Evaluative Predicates and Value-Laden Concepts 7.4. “Dog” versus “Cur” 7.5. Speech Practices 7.6. Perspective 7.7. Against Neutrality as an Ideal 8. Straight Talk 8.1. Defining Hustle via Straight Talk 8.2. Coordination and Cooperation 8.3. Leading Questions 8.4. Plausible Deniability 8.5. Hustle and the Development of Speech Practice 8.6. Is Straight Talk Central? 9. Philosophy and Ideal Theory 9.1. Nonideal Epistemology and Beyond 9.2. The Content-Delivery Model 9.3. The Ideal/Nonideal Debate in the Theory of Meaning Part IV. Oppression and Freedom 10. Harmful Speech 10.1. Oppressive Language and the Ideal of Neutrality 10.2. Slurring 10.3. Genocidal Speech 10.4. Bureaucratic Speech 11. Free Speech 11.1. On the Benefits of Free Speech 11.2. On Speaker Autonomy 11.3. Let Equality Ring Glossary of Technical Terms Bibliography Index "In much of the theory of meaning, philosophers and linguists have focused on the use of language in conveying information in cooperative informational exchanges. As a result, political uses of speech, of the sort that political propaganda exemplifies, have not been taken to be a central case of language use. In this book, Jason Stanley and David Beaver focus on the political use of speech as a central case, which leads to a foundational rethinking of the theory of meaning. By focusing on the political uses of speech, one arrives at better (and more general) tools to describe speech, as well as a more accurate view of its central functions. More dramatically, it enables us to see the ways in which virtually all speech is political-a fact that is masked by much of the theory of meaning. Stanley and Beaver's topic is speech generally-its function and how best to represent that function. Political propaganda serves as a window into that topic, since its function is not obviously to share information, or even misinformation. They emphasize the importance of understanding how political propaganda works via the topic of the justification of free speech and argue that political propaganda poses a problem for a broad range of justifications of free speech. Stanley and Beaver argue that it is not possible to compartmentalize the political aspects of speech from the non-political aspects of speech, nor is it possible to carve out a neutral deliberative space of evaluating reasons qua reasons. Speech is invariably political"-- Provided by publisher A provocative case for the inherently political nature of language In The Politics of Language , David Beaver and Jason Stanley present a radical new approach to the theory of meaning, offering an account of communication in which political and social identity, affect, and shared practices play as important a role as information. This new view of language, they argue, has dramatic consequences for free speech, democracy, and a range of other areas in which speech plays a central role. Drawing on a wealth of disciplines, The Politics of Language argues that the function of speech—whether in dialogue, larger group interactions, or mass communication—is to attune people to something, be it a shared reality, emotion, or identity. Reconceptualizing the central ideas of pragmatics and semantics, Beaver and Stanley apply their account to a range of phenomena that defy standard frameworks in linguistics and philosophy of language—from dog whistles and covert persuasion to echo chambers and genocidal speech. The authors use their framework to show that speech is inevitably political because all communication is imbued with the resonances of particular ideologies and their normative perspectives on reality. At a time when democracy is under attack, authoritarianism is on the rise, and diversity and equality are being demanded, The Politics of Language offers a powerful new vision of the language of politics, ideology, and protest.