Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law)

How is a legitimate state possible? Obedience, coercion and intrusion are three ideas that seem inseparable from all government and seem to render state authority presumptively illegitimate. This book exposes three fallacies inspired by these ideas and in doing so challenges assumptions shared by liberals, libertarians, cultural conservatives, moderates and Marxists. In three clear and tightly argued essays William Edmundson dispels these fallacies and shows that living in a just state remains a worthy ideal. This is an important book for all philosophers, political scientists and legal theorists as well as other readers interested in the views of Rawls, Dworkin and Nozick, many of whose central ideas are subjected to rigorous critique. Sereis Copyright Contents Acknowledgments Introduction I. The Fallacious Argument from the Failure of Political Obligation 1 Legitimacy and the Duty to Obey 2 The Correlativity Thesis 3 Legitimate Political Authority II. The "Law Is Coercive" Fallacy 4 The Concept of Coercion 5 Political Theory without Coercion 6 Coercion Redivivus III. The Inner Sphere of Privacy Fallacy 7 The Private Sphere 8 The Moral and the Social 9 The Social and the Political Conclusion: The State for What? Index In 1970, Robert Paul Wolff pronounced that "the fundamental problem of political philosophy [is] how the moral autonomy of the individual can be made compatible with the legitimate authority of the state." This book exposes fallacies inspired by the idea that coercion seems inseparable from government and in doing so shows that living in a just state remains a worthy ideal. William A. Edmundson. Includes Bibliographical References And Index.