The Struggle to Save the Soviet Economy: Mikhail Gorbachev and the Collapse of the USSR (New Cold War History)

For Half A Century The Soviet Economy Was Inefficient But Stable. In The Late 1980s, To The Surprise Of Nearly Everyone, It Suddenly Collapsed. Why Did This Happen? And What Role Did Soviet Leader Mikhail Gorbachev's Economic Reforms Play In The Country's Dissolution? In This Groundbreaking Study, Chris Miller Shows That Gorbachev And His Allies Tried To Learn From The Great Success Story Of Transitions From Socialism To Capitalism, Deng Xiaoping's China. Why, Then, Were Efforts To Revitalize Soviet Socialism So Much Less Successful Than In China? Making Use Of Never-before-studied Documents From The Soviet Politburo And Other Archives, Miller Argues That The Difference Between The Soviet Union And China--and The Ultimate Cause Of The Soviet Collapse--was Not Economics But Politics. The Soviet Government Was Divided By Bitter Conflict, And Gorbachev, The Ostensible Soviet Autocrat, Was Unable To Outmaneuver The Interest Groups That Were Threatened By His Economic Reforms. Miller's Analysis Settles Long-standing Debates About The Politics And Economics Of Perestroika, Transforming Our Understanding Of The Causes Of The Soviet Union's Rapid Demise. Asian Pivot: The Roots Of Soviet Economic Reform -- Take Off Or Leap Forward?: Soviet Assessments Of China After Mao -- Gorbachev's Gamble: Interest Group Politics And Perestroika -- Soviet Industry, Sichuan Style: Gorbachev's Enterprise Reforms -- A Soviet Shenzhen?: Copying China's Special Economic Zones -- Of Subsidies And Sovkhozes: Restructuring Soviet Agriculture -- Fiscal Crisis, The Tiananmen Option, And The Dissolution Of The Ussr -- Conclusion: Paths Not Taken? Chris Miller. Includes Bibliographical References And Index. "For half a century the Soviet economy was inefficient but stable. In the late 1980s, to the surprise of nearly everyone, it suddenly collapsed. Why did this happen? And what role did Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev's economic reforms play in the country's dissolution? In this groundbreaking study, Chris Miller shows that Gorbachev and his allies tried to learn from the great success story of transitions from socialism to capitalism, Deng Xiaoping's China. Why, then, were efforts to revitalize Soviet socialism so much less successful than in China? Making use of never-before-studied documents from the Soviet politburo and other archives, Miller argues that the difference between the Soviet Union and China--and the ultimate cause of the Soviet collapse--was not economics but politics. The Soviet government was divided by bitter conflict, and Gorbachev, the ostensible Soviet autocrat, was unable to outmaneuver the interest groups that were threatened by his economic reforms. Miller's analysis settles long-standing debates about the politics and economics of perestroika, transforming our understanding of the causes of the Soviet Union's rapid demise"--Publisher's website For half a century the Soviet economy was inefficient but stable. In the late 1980s, to the surprise of nearly everyone, it suddenly collapsed. Why did this happen? And what role did Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev's economic reforms play in the country's dissolution? In this study, Chris Miller shows that Gorbachev and his allies tried to learn from the great success story of transitions from socialism to capitalism, Deng Xiaoping's China. Why, then, were efforts to revitalize Soviet socialism so much less successful than in China? Making use of never-before-studied documents from the Soviet politburo and other archives, Miller argues that the difference between the Soviet Union and China - and the ultimate cause of the Soviet collapse - was not economics but politics Why did the Soviet economy suddenly collapse in the late 1980s, only a few years after Mikhail Gorbachev came to power? In this groundbreaking study, Chris Miller shows that although Gorbachev and his allies sought to learn from China's economic reforms under Deng Xiaoping, their efforts to revitalize Soviet socialism proved much less successful.