The Sentence in Biblical Hebrew (Janua Linguarum. Series Practica, 231) (German Edition)

## PREFACE Recent advances in linguistic theory and method make desirable a fresh examination of the sentence systems of natural languages. Ancient Hebrew is practically a virgin field for such research. The existing literature contains no systematic treatment of the subject. PREFACE SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS THE TRANSLITERATION OF HEBREW 1. INTRODUCTION 1.0. Traditional Grammar 1.1. Discourse Grammar Notes 2. THE SENTENCE IN HEBREW 2.0. Definition of Sentence 2.1. The Clause as a Sentence Element 2.2. Sentence Types 2.3. Complex Sentences 2.4. Compound Sentences 2.5. Relationships Between Sentence Types 2.6. Surface Grammar and Deep Grammar Notes 3. APPOSITION SENTENCES 3.0. Deep Grammar of Apposition 3.1. Surface Grammar of Apposition 3.2. Verbal Repetition in Apposition 3.3. Synonymous Apposition 3.4. Epic Repetition in Apposition 3.5. Apposition for Emphasis 3.6. Resumption and Distribution in Apposition 3.7. Explanation in Apposition 3.8. Curses and Blessings 3.9. Multiple Apposition 3.10. Apposition Instead of Other Constructions Notes 4. COORDINATION 4.0. Kinds of Coordination 4.1. Upper-level Coordination 4.2. Paragraph-level Coordination 4.3. Sentence-level Coordination 4.4. Inclusive and Exclusive Coordination 4.5. Inter-clausal Relationships in Precative and Predictive Discourse 4.6. Summary 4.7. Back-looping (Rank-shifting) 4.8. Alternative Surface Realizations 4.9. Empirical Testing Notes 5. CIRCUMSTANTIAL CLAUSES 5.0. Introduction 5.1. Episode-marginal Circumstantial Clauses 5.2. Sentence-level Circumstantial Clauses 5.3. Pseudocircumstantial Sequential Clauses 5.4. Pseudosequential Circumstantial Clauses 5.5. Circumstantial Clauses as Alternatives to Noncircumstantial Constructions 6. ADJUNCTIVE CLAUSES 6.0. Structure 6.1. Function 6.2. Adjunctive Clauses Used Circumstantially 6.3. Other Forms Notes 7. SURPRISE CLAUSES 7.0. Form 7.1. Participant Perspective 7.2. Dream Reports 7.3. Other Uses 7.4. Other Forms 8. CONJUNCTIVE SENTENCES 8.0. The Form of a Conjunctive Sentence 8.1. Declarative Conjunctive Sentences 8.2. Distributive Coordination 8.3. Conjoined Precative Clauses 8.4. Negation in Conjunctive Sentences 8.5. Conjoined Prohibitions 8.6. Coordination of Questions 8.7. Conjoining of Surprise Clauses 8.8. Coordination of Subordinate Clauses 8.9. Coordination of Relative Clauses 8.10. Conjunctive Sentences Instead of Other Constructions 9. CHIASTIC SENTENCES 9.0. The Form of Inter-clause Chiasmus 9.1. The Surface Grammar of Chiastic Sentences 9.2. The Deep Grammar of Chiasmus 9.3. Chiasmus in Narrative Prose 9.4. Grammatical Aspects of Chiasmus 9.5. Chiasmus in Predictive Discourse 9.6. Chiasmus in Precative Discourse 9.7. Chiasmus in Prohibition 9.8. Incompletely Formed Chiasmus 9.9. Discontinuous Chiastic Sentences 9.10. Chiasmus as a High-level Node 9.11. Chiastic Sentence as Nucleus 9.12. Chiasmus a Distortion 9.13. Sequential Clauses in Chiasmus Notes 10. DISJUNCTIVE SENTENCES 10.0. Disjunctive Coordination 10.1. Phrase-level Disjunction 10.2. Disjunctive Coordination above Phrase Level 10.3. Disjunctive Questions 10.4. Disjunctive Realization of Conjunctive Relationships 10.5. Conjunctive Realization of Disjunctive Relationships Notes 11. CONTRASTIVE SENTENCES 11.0. The Degree of Contrast 11.1. Contrastive Sentences and Other Constructions 11.2. Contrast with Pronoun Subjects 11.3. Contrast with Nouns as Subjects 11.4. Contrast with Objects 11.5. Other Items in Contrast 11.6. Exceptions 11.7. Contrast Sentence with Asyndeton 12. INCLUSIVE SENTENCES 12.0. Inclusion and Addition 12.1. Phrase-level Coordination Using GAM 12.2. Trans-sentence Inclusive Phrases 12.3. Double Coordination 12.4. Inclusive Coordination and Sentence Types 12.5. Inclusive Coordination and Negation 12.6. The Implication of Inclusive Coordination 12.7. Noninclusive Uses of GAM 12.8. GAM not a Conjunction 12.9. The Hierarchical Significance of GAM Notes 13. EXCLUSIVE SENTENCES 13.0. Signals of Exclusive Relationships 13.1. The Form of the Exclusive Relationship 13.2. Phrase-level Exclusion 13.3. Trans-sentence Exclusive Phrases 13.4. Exclusive Sentences 13.5. Exclusive Forms used for Antithetical Relationships 13.6. Exclusive Forms Used for Coordination or Apposition 13.7. Exclusive Relationships Realized by Antithetical Forms 13.8. Phrase ‘Adverb’ and Clause ‘Adverb’ 13.9. Limitative ‘Adverbs’ 13.10. Limitative Clause-modifier 13.11. Summary Notes 14. ANTITHETICAL SENTENCES 14.0. Antithesis between Clauses 14.1. The Form of Antithetical Sentences 14.2. Antithesis with Implicit Negation 14.3. Antithesis by Means of Antonyms 14.4. Antithesis by Negation 14.5. Antithesis After Negation 14.6. Antithetical Questions 14.7. Antithesis in Apposition Notes 15. SURFACE REALIZATIONS AND DEEP RELATIONSHIPS 15.0. Introduction 15.1. Alternative Surface Realizations 15.2. Limitations in Alternative Realizations 15.3. Juxtaposition and Concatenation 15.4. Coordination and Subordination INDEX OF BIBLICAL REFERENCES

Die zentrale These der Untersuchung zur Frühgeschichte der Literatursoziologie und Literaturgeschichtsschreibung lautet, daß die Entstehung literatursoziologischer Fragestellungen divergierende und konkurrierende literarische Positionen und mithin die Genese eines literarischen Feldes voraussetzt. Im Anschluß an die genaue Rekonstruktion der Theorie des literarischen Feldes von Pierre Bourdieu wird im Vergleich der französischen und deutschen Verhältnisse in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. und beginnenden 20. Jahrhunderts gezeigt, daß die frühe Literatursoziologie maßgeblich durch die Kultursoziologie Georg Simmels mitbestimmt worden ist und der heute beinahe vergessene Literat Samuel Lublinski eine wichtige Verbindung zwischen Literaturkritik, Literaturwissenschaft und Literatursoziologie hergestellt hat. Besondere Beachtung erfahren dabei die Entwicklungstendenzen zu einem ästhetische und soziale Momente umfassenden Formbegriff. In genauen Einzeluntersuchungen wird dies insbesondere am Beispiel der Verbindung von Georg Simmel und Georg Lukács belegt, über dessen Stilbegriff - verstanden als "historische Kategorie" und als "synthetische Methode" - die Komplementarität zwischen Bourdieu und Lukács herausgearbeitet wird.