The Revolt of 1916 in Russian Central Asia (The Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science Book 71)

During The Summer Of 1916, Approximately 270,000 Central Asians—kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Tajiks, Turkmen, And Uzbeks—perished At The Hands Of The Russian Army In A Revolt That Began With Resistance To The Tsar’s World War I Draft. In Addition To Those Killed Outright, Tens Of Thousands Of Men, Women, And Children Died While Trying To Escape Over Treacherous Mountain Passes Into China. Experts Calculate That The Kyrgyz, Who Suffered Most Heavily, Lost 40% Of Their Total Population. This Horrific Incident Was Nearly Lost To History. During The Soviet Era, The Massacre Of 1916 Became A Taboo Subject, Hidden In Sealed Archives And Banished From History Books. Edward Dennis Sokol’s Pioneering Revolt Of 1916 In Russian Central Asia, Published In 1954 And Reissued Now For The First Time In Decades, Was For Generations The Only Scholarly Study Of The Massacre In Any Language.^ Drawing On Early Soviet Periodicals, Including Krasnyi Arkhiv ( The Red Archive), Sokol’s Wide-ranging And Exhaustively Researched Work Explores The Tsarist Policies That Led To Russian Encroachment Against The Land And Rights Of The Indigenous Central Asian People. It Describes The Corruption That Permeated Russian Colonial Rule And Argues That The Uprising Was No Mere Draft Riot, But A Revolt Against Tsarist Colonialism In All Its Dimensions: Economic, Political, Religious, And National. Sokol’s Masterpiece Also Traces The Chain Reaction Between The Uprising, The Collapse Of Tsarism, And The Bolshevik Revolution. A Classic Study Of A Vanished World, Sokol's Work Takes On Contemporary Resonance In Light Of Vladimir Putin’s Heavy-handed Efforts To Persuade Kyrgyzstan To Join His New Economic Union. Sokol Explains How An Earlier Russian Conquest Ended In Disaster And Implies That A Modern Conquest Might Have The Same Effect.^ Essential Reading For Historians, Political Scientists, And Policymakers, This Reissued Edition Is Being Published To Coincide With The Centennial Observation Of The Genocide. Edward Dennis Sokol (1923–2014) Earned His Ba From Johns Hopkins University In 1947 And His Phd In 1952. S. Frederick Starr Is The Founding Chairman Of The Central Asia−caucasus Institute And Silk Road Studies Program. He Is The Author Of Lost Enlightenment: Central Asia’s Golden Age From The Arab Conquest To Tamerlane. For Me The Tragedy Of 1916 Had Always Been A Precursor To The National Liberation Movement Of Kyrgyz People, Although I Did Not Realize The Depth And Reach Of These Events In The History Of Central Asia. Edward Sokol's The Revolt Of 1916 Was A Revelation. The Author Portrays The People Of Central Asia, As Well As The Formation Of Their Identity And Their Rights For Self-determination, In The Big Picture And Not Through Soviet Eyes.^ His Book Gives The Reader A New Perspective On These Events And Allows Us To Reconsider History. — Zamira Sydykova, Former Ambassador Of Kyrgyzstan To The United States Of America And Canada. The Revolt Of 1916 -- The Economic Background To The Revolt Of 1916 -- The Political Background To The Revolt Of 1916 -- The Revolt Of 1916: First Phase -- The Revolt Of 1916: Second Phase -- The End Of The Revolt -- The Revolt In Retrospect. Edward Dennis Sokol ; With A New Foreword By S. Frederick Starr. Originally Published: 1954. Includes Bibliographical References (pages 181-183) And Index.

During the summer of 1916, approximately 270,000 Central Asians—Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Tajiks, Turkmen, and Uzbeks—perished at the hands of the Russian army in a revolt that began with resistance to the Tsar’s World War I draft. In addition to those killed outright, tens of thousands of men, women, and children died while trying to escape over treacherous mountain passes into China. Experts calculate that the Kyrgyz, who suffered most heavily, lost 40% of their total population.

This horrific incident was nearly lost to history. During the Soviet era, the massacre of 1916 became a taboo subject, hidden in sealed archives and banished from history books. Edward Dennis Sokol’s pioneering Revolt of 1916 in Russian Central Asia, published in 1954 and reissued now for the first time in decades, was for generations the only scholarly study of the massacre in any language. Drawing on early Soviet periodicals, including Krasnyi Arkhiv (The Red Archive), Sokol’s wide-ranging and exhaustively researched work explores the Tsarist policies that led to Russian encroachment against the land and rights of the indigenous Central Asian people. It describes the corruption that permeated Russian colonial rule and argues that the uprising was no mere draft riot, but a revolt against Tsarist colonialism in all its dimensions: economic, political, religious, and national. Sokol’s masterpiece also traces the chain reaction between the uprising, the collapse of Tsarism, and the Bolshevik Revolution.

A classic study of a vanished world, Sokol's work takes on contemporary resonance in light of Vladimir Putin’s heavy-handed efforts to persuade Kyrgyzstan to join his new economic union. Sokol explains how an earlier Russian conquest ended in disaster and implies that a modern conquest might have the same effect. Essential reading for historians, political scientists, and policymakers, this reissued edition is being published to coincide with the centennial observation of the genocide.

Foreword, by S. Frederick Starr Preface 1 The Revolt of 1916 2 The Economic Background to the Revolt of 1916 A. Russian Economic Interests in Central Asia before the Conquest B. Russian Economic Policy towards the Sarts 1. Land Policy 2. The Introduction of American Cotton 3. The Russians in Turkistan C. Russian Economic Policy towards the Nomads 3 The Political Background to the Revolt of 1916 A. The Administration of the Country B. The Political Situation up to 1898 C. The Andijan Uprising D. The Political Situation after 1898 1. Enquiry of Count Palen 2. The Political Situation among the Sarts 3. The Political Situation among the Kazakhs and Kirghiz 4 The Revolt of 1916: First Phase A. War Comes to Turkistan B. The Reaction of the Natives to the War C. The Supreme Command of June 25 D. Meeting of the Governors of the Central Asian Krai E. The Revolt among the Sarts F. The Appointment of General Kuropatkin as Governor-General 5 The Revolt of 1916: Second Phase A. The Revolt of the Kirghiz and Kazakhs 1. The Announcement of the Supreme Order 2. The Revolt in the Steppe Oblasts 3. The Revolt in Semipalatinsk 4. The Revolt in Semirechie 5. The Flight of the Insurgents to China B. The Revolt of the Turkomans 6 The End of the Revolt A. Group Participation in the Revolt of 1916 1. The Well-to-Do Groups 2. The Poor B. The Question of Foreign Influence C. Measures Taken for the Securing of Peace in the Future 1. Military Measures 2. Administrative Measures D. The Balance Sheet of Damage Suffered E. The Dispatch of Workers to the Front F. The Duma and the Revolt 7 The Revolt in Retrospect A. The Early Soviet Interpretation of the Revolt B. The Recent Soviet Interpretation C. In Summing Up Bibliography Index "The classic study of resistance to Tsarist Russian colonialism, the genocide that followed, and its connection to the Bolshevik Revolution. In 1916, Tzar Nicholas II began drafting Russian subjects across Central Asia to fight in World War I. By summer, the widespread resistance of Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Tajiks, Turkmen, and Uzbeks turned into an outright revolt. The Russian Imperial Army killed approximately 270,000 of these people, while tens of thousands more died in their attempt to escape into China. Suppressed during the Soviet Era and nearly lost to history, knowledge of this horrific incident is remembered thanks to Edward Dennis Sokol's pioneering Revolt of 1916 in Russian Central Asia. This wide-ranging and exhaustively researched book explores the Tsarist policies that led to Russian encroachment against the land and rights of the indigenous Central Asian people. It describes the corruption that permeated Russian colonial rule and argues that the uprising was no mere draft riot, but a revolt against Tsarist colonialism in all its dimensions: economic, political, religious, and national. Sokol's masterpiece also traces the chain reaction between the uprising, the collapse of Tsarism, and the Bolshevik Revolution."-- Provided by Freading