The Power of Planning - Spaces of Control and Transformation (GEOJOURNAL LIBRARY Volume 67) (GeoJournal Library)

The book addresses critically the question:'What is the societal impact of urban and regional planning?'. It begins with a theoretical discussion and then analyses, through a series of case studies, the intentions, contents, struggles and consequences of urban and regional planning. It shows that plans and policies often defy the commonly perceived role of advancing equality, justice, development and amenity, by causing social problems, marginalisation and inequalities. The book looks at planning from a critical distance, without a priori belief in its necessity or usefulness. The 12 chapters, written by renowned international scholars, demonstrate the multiplicity of social and political struggles over the contested terrain of spatial policies. The book focuses on four key areas where the impact of planning is explored: the community power, gender relations, ethnic tensions, and social polarisation, while comparing three societies: Australia, Israel and England. Audience: This volume is mainly intended for faculty and students of academia, but also for urban professionals and policy-makers. The book is relevant to fields such as urban and regional planning, geography, political science, urban studies, urban sociology, urban anthropology, ethnic and gender relations.

Scholars of geography and regional planning from a wide range of countries assess planning in relation to social and political concerns, especially its power to shape societal relations. Of the several assumptions about and approaches to planning that they examine critically, they pay most attention to the unchallenged acceptance of planning's benevolent power. Others include a confused demarcation of disciplinary boundaries, a dominance of professional perspectives, a privileging of process over substance, and a slighting of planning's spatial dimensions. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR

Booknews

Scholars of geography and regional planning from a wide range of countries assess planning in relation to social and political concerns, especially its power to shape societal relations. Of the several assumptions about and approaches to planning that they examine critically, they pay most attention to the unchallenged acceptance of planning's benevolent power. Others include a confused demarcation of disciplinary boundaries, a dominance of professional perspectives, a privileging of process over substance, and a slighting of planning's spatial dimensions. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)