امکان بحث: نسبی‌گرایی، حقیقت و نقد باورهای دینی (سلسله‌نشریهٔ تفکر انتقادی نو در فلسفه)

Answering the question 'How is fruitful discussion possible?', this book addresses the central philosophical issue of how reason shall be understood and how it is limited. This study argues that the understanding of discussion according to which it necessarily starts from putative universal norms and rules for argumentation is problematic, among other reasons since such rules are unfruitful in contexts where there are vast disagreements such as religion. Inspired by Wittgensteinian ideas, Strandberg develops instead a new way of understanding discussion, truth and rationality which escapes these problems, and shows how this solution can be used to answer the accusation against Wittgensteinian philosophy for being conservative and resulting in fideism. MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict Contents 6 Preface 8 Introduction 10 1 The Unfruitfulness of Rationalistic Discussion of Religious Belief 26 2 Religious Belief and the Diverse Ways We Deal with the World around Us 36 3 Problems of Relativism 52 4 The Demand for Universality 68 5 The Objectivity of Truth 100 6 How Is Fruitful Discussion Possible? 130 7 Wittgenstein, Conservatism and Fideism 158 8 Philosophy of Religion and Enlightenment Thinking 182 Bibliography 190 Index 206 A 206 B 206 C 206 D 206 E 206 F 206 G 206 H 206 I 206 J 206 K 207 L 207 M 207 N 207 O 207 P 207 R 207 S 207 T 207 U 208 W 208 The Unfruitfulness Of Rationalistic Discussion Of Religious Belief -- Religious Belief And The Diverse Ways We Deal With The World Around Us -- Problems Of Relativism -- The Demand For Universality -- The Objectivity Of Truth -- How Is Fruitful Discussion Possible? -- Wittgenstein, Conservatism, And Fideism -- Philosophy Of Religion And Enlightenment Thinking. Hugo Strandberg. Includes Bibliographical References (p. [181]-195) And Index. Annotation This book addresses the central philosophical issue of how reason shall be understood and how it is limited. This study argues that the understanding of discussion according to which it necessarily starts from putative universal norms and rules for argumentation is problematic, among other reasons since such rules are unfruitful in contexts where there are vast disagreements such as religion How is fruitful discussion possible? This book addresses the central philosophical issue of how reason shall be understood and how it is limited. Inspired by Wittgensteinian ideas, Strandberg develops a new way of understanding discussion, truth and rationality and shows how the solution can be used to answer the accusation against Wittgensteinian philosophy for being overly conservative The unfruitfulness of rationalistic discussion of religious beliefs Religious belief and the diverse ways we deal with the world around us Problems of relativism The demand for universality The objectivity of truth How is fruitful discussion possible? Wittgenstein, conservatism, and Fideism Philosophy of religion and Enlightenment thinking.