The Politics of Survival: Peirce, Affectivity, and Social Criticism (American Philosophy)

'this Is A Brave Book, Balancing Strong Scholarship, Clear Organization, And A Provocative-reading Peirce.-roger Ward, Georgetown College. The Politics Of Survival Provides A Lucid, Compelling, And Exceptionally Accessible Account Of The Relevance Of Peirce And Pragmatism To Contemporary Discussions Of Social Justice. Trout Demonstrates How Peirce's Philosophy Rises Above His Personal Prejudices To Provide A Unique Set Of Tools For Analyzing And Criticizing The Nonconscious Biases Of Those Who Believe They Are Free Of Prejudice. The Politics Of Surival Is Unmatched In The Manner In Which It Makes Peirce And Pragmatism Relevant To Recent Literature On Racism And Sexism.-mitchell Aboulafia, The Juilliard School. How Can Sincere, Well-meaning People Unintentionally Perpetuate Discrimination Based On Race, Sex, Sexuality, Or Other Sociopolitical Factors? To Address This Question, Lara Trout Engages A Neglected Dimension Of Charles S. Peirce's Philosophyùhuman Embodimentùin Order To Highlight The Compatibility Between Peirce's Ideas And Contemporary Work In Social Criticism. This Compatibility; Which Has Been Neglected In Both Peircean And Social Criticism Scholarship, Emerges When The Body Is Foregrounded Among The Affective Dimensions Of Peirce's Philosophy (including Feeling, Emotion, Belief, Doubt, Instinct, And Habit). Trout Explains Unintentional Discrimination By Situating Peircean Affectivity Within A Post-darwinian Context, Using The Work Of Contemporary Neuroscientist Antonio Damasio To Facilitate This Contextual Move: Because Children Are Vulnerable, Naive,-and Dependent Upon Their Caretakers For Survival, They Must Trust, Their Caretakers' Testimony About Reality: This Dependency, Coupled With Societal Norms That Reinforce Historically Dominant Perspectives (such As Being Heterosexual, Male, Middle-class, And/or White), Fosters The Internalization Of Discriminatory Habits That Function Nonconsciously In Adulthood. The Potitics Of Survival Bringss. Peirce And Social Criticism Into Conversation. On The One Hand, Peircean Cognition, Epistemology, Phenomenology,and Metaphysics Dovetail With Social Critical Msiihts Into The Interrelationships Among Body And Mind, Emotion And Reason, Self And Society. Moreover, Peirce's Epistemological Ideal Of An Infinitely Inclusive Community Of Inquiry Into Knowledge And Reality Implies A Repudiation Of Exclusionary Prejudice. On The Other Hand, Work In Feminism And Race Theory Illustrates How The Application Of Peirce's Infinitely Inclusive Communal Ideal Can Be Undermined By Nonconscious Habits Of Exclusion Internalized In Childhood By Members Belonging To Historically Dominant Groups, Such As The Economically Privileged, Heterosexuals, Men, And Whites. Trout Offers A Peircean Response To This Application Problem That Both Acknowledges The Blind Spots Of Nonconscious Discrimination And Recommends A Communally Situated Network Of Remedies Including Agapic Love, Critical Common - Sensism, Scientific Method, And Self-control. --book Jacket. Peircean Affectivity -- The Affectivity Of Cognition : Journal Of Speculative Philosophy Cognition Series, 1868-69 -- The Affectivity Of Inquiry : Popular Science Monthly Illustrations Of The Logic Of Science Series, 1877-78 -- The Law Of Mind, Association, And Sympathy : Monist Cosmology Series And Association Writings, 1890s -- Critical Common-sensism, 1900s. Lara Trout. Includes Bibliographical References And Index.

How can sincere, well-meaning people unintentionally perpetuate discrimination based on race, sex, sexuality, or other socio-political factors? To address this question, Lara Trout engages a neglected dimension of Charles S. Peirce's philosophy - human embodiment - in order to highlight the compatibility between Peirce's ideas and contemporary work in social criticism. This compatibility, which has been neglected in both Peircean and social criticism scholarship, emerges when the body is fore-grounded among the affective dimensions of Peirce's philosophy (including feeling, emotion, belief, doubt, instinct, and habit). Trout explains unintentional discrimination by situating Peircean affectivity within a post-Darwinian context, using the work of contemporary neuroscientist Antonio Damasio to facilitate this contextual move. Since children are vulnerable, naïve, and dependent upon their caretakers for survival, they must trust their caretaker's testimony about reality. This dependency, coupled with societal norms that reinforce historically dominant perspectives (such as being heterosexual, male, middle-class, and/or white), fosters the internalization of discriminatory habits that function non-consciously in adulthood. The Politics of Survival brings Peirce and social criticism into conversation. On the one hand, Peircean cognition, epistemology, phenomenology, and metaphysics dovetail with social critical insights into the inter-relationships among body and mind, emotion and reason, self and society. Moreover, Peirce's epistemological ideal of an infinitely inclusive community of inquiry into knowledge and reality implies a repudiation of exclusionary prejudice. On the other hand, work in feminism and race theory illustrates how the application of Peirce's infinitely inclusive communal ideal can be undermined by non-conscious habits of exclusion internalized in childhood by members belonging to historically dominant groups, such as the economically privileged, heterosexuals, men, and whites. Trout offers a Peircean response to this application problem that both acknowledges the "blind spots" of non-conscious discrimination and recommends a communally situated network of remedies including agapic love, critical common-sensism, scientific method, and self-control.

How can sincere, well-meaning people unintentionally perpetuate discrimination based on race, sex, sexuality, or other socio-political factors? To address this question, Lara Trout engages a neglected dimension of Charles S. Peirce's philosophy - human embodiment - in order to highlight the compatibility between Peirce's ideas and contemporary work in social criticism. This compatibility, which has been neglected in both Peircean and social criticism scholarship, emerges when the body is fore-grounded among the affective dimensions of Peirce's philosophy (including feeling, emotion, belief, doubt, instinct, and habit). Trout explains unintentional discrimination by situating Peircean affectivity within a post-Darwinian context, using the work of contemporary neuroscientist Antonio Damasio to facilitate this contextual move. Since children are vulnerable, naïve, and dependent upon their caretakers for survival, they must trust their caretaker's testimony about reality. This dependency, coupled with societal norms that reinforce historically dominant perspectives (such as being heterosexual, male, middle-class, and/or white), fosters the internalization of discriminatory habits that function non-consciously in adulthood.
The Politics of Survival brings Peirce and social criticism into conversation. On the one hand, Peircean cognition, epistemology, phenomenology, and metaphysics dovetail with social critical insights into the inter-relationships among body and mind, emotion and reason, self and society. Moreover, Peirce's epistemological ideal of an infinitely inclusive community of inquiry into knowledge and reality implies a repudiation of exclusionary prejudice. On the other hand, work in feminism and race theory illustrates how the application of Peirce's infinitely inclusive communal ideal can be undermined by non-conscious habits of exclusion internalized in childhood by members belonging to historically dominant groups, such as the economically privileged, heterosexuals, men, and whites. Trout offers a Peircean response to this application problem that both acknowledges the "blind spots" of non-conscious discrimination and recommends a communally situated network of remedies including agapic love, critical common-sensism, scientific method, and self-control.