The Poison in the Gift : Ritual, Prestation, and the Dominant Caste in a North Indian Village
معرفی کتاب «The Poison in the Gift : Ritual, Prestation, and the Dominant Caste in a North Indian Village» نوشتهٔ Gloria Goodwin Raheja، منتشرشده توسط نشر The University of Chicago Press در سال 1988. این کتاب در فرمت pdf، زبان انگلیسی ارائه شده است.
The Poison in the Gift is a detailed ethnography of gift-giving in a North Indian village that powerfully demonstrates a new theoretical interpretation of caste. Introducing the concept of ritual centrality, Raheja shows that the position of the dominant landholding caste in the village is grounded in a central-peripheral configuration of castes rather than a hierarchical ordering. She advances a view of caste as semiotically constituted of contextually shifting sets of meanings, rather than one overarching ideological feature. This new understanding undermines the controversial interpretation advanced by Louis Dumont in his 1966 book, Homo Hierarchicus, in which he proposed a disjunction between the ideology of hierarchy based on the purity of the Brahman priest and the temporal power of the dominant caste or the king.
Booknews
Raheja (S. Asian studies, U. Chicago) on the ethnography of gift- giving in a North Indian village. She sets forth a new interpretation of caste showing that members of the dominant landholding caste in the village, rather than the Brahman priests, are the ideological point of reference for the village because of their central role in ritual gift-giving. Her interpretation undermines the controversial point of view advanced by Louis Dumont in his book Homo Hierarchicus. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
This monograph is a study of the semiotic aspects of giving and receiving, len-den as it is called, in the Hindi-speaking region of northern India. It is based on eighteen months of fieldwork, carried out mostly in the village of Panhansu, from September 1977 to March 1979. More specifically, it is a study of the way in which three important aspects of intercaste and kinship relations--aspects that I have called centrality and mutuality, as well as hierarchy--are differentially foregrounded and implemented in the contexts of the giving and receiving of particular named prestations.