The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture : The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament

Victors not only write history: they also reproduce the texts. Bart Ehrman explores the close relationship between the social history of early Christianity and the textual tradition of the emerging New Testament, examining how early struggles between Christian "heresy" and "orthodoxy" affected the transmission of the documents over which many of the debates were waged. He makes a crucial contribution to our understanding of the social and intellectual history of early Christianity and raises intriguing questions about the relationship of readers to their texts, especially in an age when scribes could transform the documents they reproduced. This edition includes a new afterword surveying research in biblical interpretation over the past twenty years. "Exploring the close relationship between the social history of early Christianity and the textual tradition of the emerging New Testament, Bart Ehrman examines how early struggles between Christian "heresy" and "orthodoxy" affected the transmission of the documents over which, in part, the debates were waged. In the process, he provides a valuable analysis of significant textual problems that continue to puzzle New Testament scholars." "Ehrman argues that scribes of the second and third centuries occasionally altered their sacred texts for polemical reasons. In order to make them support established christological doctrine, scribes imported orthodox motions into passages, or modified texts that might have lent support to heretical views. Closely examining three such heresies, Ehrman identifies how the proto-orthodox response affected the evolving texts of scripture, devoting a chapter to adoptionists like the Ebionites, who claimed that Christ was a man but not God; one to docetists like Marcion, who claimed that Christ was God but not a man; and another to Gnostics like the Ptolemaeans, who claimed that Christ was two beings, one divine and one human." "The first full-length work to evaluate textual data with reference to specific controversies between orthodoxy and heresies, Ehrman's thorough and incisive analysis makes a vital contribution to our understanding of the social and intellectual history of early Christianity. In addition, it raises intriguing questions about the relationship of readers to their texts - especially in an age when scribes could transform the documents they reproduced to make them say what they were already thought to mean, effecting thereby the orthodox corruption of Scripture."--Jacket

the Victors Not Only Write The History, They Also Reproduce The Texts. In A Study That Explores The Close Relationship Between The Social History Of Early Christianity And The Textual Tradition Of The Emerging New Testament, Ehrman Examines How Early Struggles Between Christian Heresy And Orthodoxy Affected The Transmission Of The Documents Over Which, In Part, The Debates Were Waged. His Thesis Is That Proto-orthodox Scribes Of The Second And Third Centuries Occasionally Altered Their Sacred Texts For Polemical Reasons—for Example, To Oppose Adoptionists Like The Ebionites, Who Claimed That Christ Was A Man But Not God, Or Docetists Like Marcion, Who Claimed That He Was God But Not A Man, Or Gnostics Like The Ptolemaeans, Who Claimed That He Was Two Beings, One Divine And One Human. Ehrman's Thorough And Incisive Analysis Makes A Significant Contribution To Our Understanding Of The Social And Intellectual History Of Early Christianity And Raises Intriguing Questions About The Relationship Of Readers To Their Texts, Especially In An Age When Scribes Could Transform The Documents They Reproduced To Make Them say What They Were Already Thought To mean, Effecting Thereby The Orthodox Corruption Of Scripture.