The New Pearl Harbor Revisited : 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé

In 2004, David Ray Griffin published The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11. Translated into several languages, it helped spark a worldwide movement demanding "9/11 truth." Even as it became increasingly outdated, it continued to be widely cited as the best introduction to the issues. Griffin has now written The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, which provides a chapter-by-chapter updating of the information provided in that earlier book. It shows that the case against the official account constructed by independent researchers - who now include architects, engineers, physicists, pilots, politicians, and former military officers - is far stronger than it was in 2004, leaving no doubt that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, designed to give the Bush-Cheney administration a pretext to attack oil-rich Muslim nations. Taken together, these two books provide everything one needs to make an informed decision about 9/11 - whether one is a journalist, a political leader, a religious leader, or an ordinary citizen concerned about truth, democracy, and the rule of law. This second edition contains a 30-page Afterword with additional material on the alleged hijackers, controlled demolition of the WTC, Sibel Edmonds, and the 9/11 Commission, plus a discussion of whether Standard Operating Procedures had been changed in June 2001. From a skeptical vantage-point, but also taking to heart the classic idea that those who benefit from a crime ought to at least be investigated, Griffin, an eminent philosopher and theologian, brings together an account of the national tragedy that is far more logical than the one we've been asked to believe. Gathering stories from the mainstream press, reports from other countries, the work of other researchers, and the contradictory words of members of the Bush administration themselves, Griffin presents a case that leaves very little doubt that the attacks of 9/11 need to be further investigated.The disturbing questions emerge from every part of the story, from every angle, until it is impossible not to seriously doubt the official story, and suspect its architects of enormous deception. Long a teacher of ethics and systematic theology, Griffin writes with compelling and passionate logic, urging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence outlined. The New Pearl Harbor rings with the conviction that it is possible, even today, to search for the truth; it is a stirring call that we demand a real investigation into what happened on 9/11. Flight 11, Flight 175, And The World Trade Center : New Developments -- Flight 77 And The Pentagon : New Developments -- Flight 93 : Additional Evidence Against The Official Story -- Bush At The School In Sarasota : Cover-up Attempts -- Evidence Of Advance Information : The 9/11 Commission's Treatment -- Continuing Obstructions And New Doubts About Hijackers -- Motives Of Us Officials : The Silence Of The 9/11 Commission -- 9/11 Commission Falsehoods About Bin Laden, Al-qaeda, Pakistanis, And Saudis -- Complicity By Us Officials : A Summary Of The Evidence -- New Revelations About The 9/11 Commission And The Strengthened Case For A New Investigation. David Ray Griffin. Includes Bibliographical References (p. 259-339) And Index. Flights 11 and 175 and the World Trade Center : new developments Flight 77 and the Pentagon : new developments Flight 93 : multiple evidence against the official story Bush at the Sarasota School : cover-up attempts Evidence of advance information : the 9/11 Commission's treatment Continuing obstructions and new doubts about hijackers Motives by US officials : the silence of the 9/11 Commission 9/11 Commission falsehoods about Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda, Pakistanis, and Saudis Complicity by US officials : a summary of the evidence New revelations about the 9/11 Commission and the strengthened case for a new investigation. Presents evidence and research arguing that the official account of the attacks on September 11, 2001 is fraudulent, examining dozens of omissions, contradictions, and distortions in the U.S. government's story that led to the Iraq War, and analyzes the investigative commission's processes regarding the attacks