The making of the Chinese state : ethnicity and expansion on the Ming borderlands

"In this well-crafted 2006 study of the relationships between the state and its borderlands, Leo Shin traces the roots of China's modern ethnic configurations to the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644). Challenging the traditional view that China's expansion was primarily an exercise of incorporation and assimilation, Shin argues that as the centre extended its reach to the wild and inaccessible south, the political interests of the state, the economic needs of the settlers, and the imaginations of the cultural elites all facilitated the demarcation and categorisation of these borderland 'non-Chinese' populations. The story told here, however, extends beyond the imperial period. Just as Ming emperors considered it essential to reinforce a sense of universal order by demarcating the 'non-Chinese, ' modern-day Chinese rulers also find it critical to maintain the myth of a unified multi-national state by officially recognising a total of fifty-six 'nationalities'."--Page 4 of cover In This Study Of The Relationships Between The State And Its Borderlands, Leo Shin Traces The Roots Of China's Modern Ethnic Configurations To The Ming Dynasty (1368-1644). Challenging The Traditional View That China's Expansion Was Primarily An Exercise Of Incorporation And Assimilation, Shin Argues That As The Center Extended Its Reach To The Wild And Inaccessible South, The Political Interests Of The State, The Economic Needs Of The Settlers, And The Imaginations Of The Cultural Elites All Facilitated The Demarcation And Categorization Of The Borderland Non-chinese Populations. The Story Told Here, However, Extends Beyond The Imperial Period. Just As Ming Emperors Considered It Essential To Reinforce A Sense Of Universal Order By Demarcating The Non-chinese, Modern-day Chinese Rulers Also Find It Critical To Maintain The Myth Of A Unitary Multi-national State By Officially Recognizing A Total Of Fifty-six Nationalities.--jacket. History Of The Margins -- Nature Of The Borderland -- Politics Of Chieftaincy -- Mapping Of Settlement -- Culture Of Demarcation -- Margins In History. Leo K. Shin. Includes Bibliographical References And Index. In this innovative and well-crafted study of the relationships between the state and its borderlands, Leo Shin traces the roots of China's modern ethnic configurations to the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644). Challenging the traditional view that China's expansion was primarily an exercise of incorporation and assimilation, Shin argues that as the center extended its reach to the wild and inaccessible south, the political interests of the state, the economic needs of the settlers, and the imaginations of the cultural elites all facilitated the demarcation and categorization of the borderland "non-Chinese" populations. The story told here, however, extends beyond the imperial period. Just as Ming emperors considered it essential to reinforce a sense of universal order by demarcating the "non-Chinese," modern-day Chinese rulers also find it critical to maintain the myth of a unitary multi-national state by officially recognizing a total of fifty-six "nationalities." Leo Shin traces the roots of China's modern ethnic configurations to the Ming dynasty (1368-1644). Challenging the traditional view that China's expansion was primarily an exercise of incorporation and assimilation, Shin argues that as the center extended its reach to the wild and inaccessible south, the political interests of the state, the economic needs of the settlers, and the imaginations of the cultural elites all facilitated the demarcation and categorization of these borderland 'non-Chinese' populations. Similarly, modern-day Chinese rulers also find it critical to officially recognize a total of fifty-six 'nationalities'. In this well-crafted study of the relationships between the state and its borderlands, Leo Shin traces the roots of China's ethnic configurations to the Ming dynasty. Shin argues that the categorisation of borderland 'non-Chinese' populations was facilitated by the political interests of the state and the settlers' economic needs.