The Literary Subversions of Medieval Women (The New Middle Ages)

V arious individuals have helped midwife this book into being, through invited lectures and symposia and conferences about medieval women during which I first aired a portion of what became a chapter in this book, through answers to my queries, or through encouragement and support. Among them are This study of medieval women as postcolonial writers defines the literary strategies of subversion by which they authorized their alterity within the dominant tradition. To dismantle a colonizing culture, they made public the private feminine space allocated by gender difference: they constructed 'unhomely' spaces. They inverted gender roles of characters to valorize the female; they created alternate idealized feminist societies and cultures, or utopias, through fantasy; and they legitimized female triviality the homely female space to provide autonomy. While these methodologies often overlapped in practice, they illustrate how cultures impinge on languages to create what Deleuze and Guattari have identified as a minor literature, specifically for women as dis-placed. Women writers discussed include Hrotsvit of Gandersheim, Hildegard of Bingen, Marie de France, Marguerite Porete, Catherine of Siena, Margery Kempe, Julian of Norwich, and Christine de Pizan. Front Matter....Pages i-xiii Introduction: The Discursive Strategies of the Marginalized....Pages 1-22 St. Agnes and the Emperor’s Daughter in Saxon Hrotsvit of Gandersheim: Feminizing the Founding of the Early Roman Church....Pages 23-39 Marie de France Versus King Arthur: Lanval’s Gender Inversion as Breton Subversion....Pages 41-61 Marguerite Porete’s Annihilation of the Character Reason in Her Fantasy of an Inverted Church....Pages 63-97 Unhomely Margery Kempe and St. Catherine of Siena: “Comunycacyon” and “Conuersacion” as Homily....Pages 99-126 Conclusion: Toward a Minor Literature: Julian of Norwich’s Annihilation of Original Sin....Pages 127-133 Back Matter....Pages 135-215