Structuralism

This book is a forensic analysis of what effectively is a crime scene. Ground Zero and the surrounding areas were photographed countless thousands of times, yet no one really assessed all of the phenomena found in these photographs. What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened at Ground Zero. Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, "9/11 was an inside job," is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that "19 bad guys with box cutters did it." Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed. The order of crime solving is to determine 1) WHAT happened, then 2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then 3) WHO did it. And only then can we address 4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive). Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. Yet, before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done. Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory. My research is not speculation. It is a forensic investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11. The 9/11 event (2001) resulted in the "dustification" of the World Trade Center (WTC) complex; and this book presents the evidence for what could have done this. All conventional technologies are ruled out; and, many of the features of the event are similar to Hutchison Effects, thereby leaving as the only possibility that this "dustification" was done by some classified "beam weapon." If you are among those who have called for a new, open, and independent 9/11 investigation, this book is the only comprehensive forensic investigation to date in the public domain. The evidence presented in this book was part of the federal qui tam (whistleblower) case that Dr. Wood filed (2007) in which she accused the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to "Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed ..." yet NIST admitted to Dr. Wood that they did not analyze the "collapse." The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final. Sadly, this case had no support from the "Truth movement," leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. "Summary: To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence... None of the facts, events, anomalies, or phenomena that have been listed, discussed, and analyzed in this book can be explained by airliner crashes, jet fuel fires, or any scheme of controlled demolition. A comparison of the 911 evidence collected with the evidence of results produced by the well-established Hutchison Effect shows that a similar technology was employed in the destruction of the towers..."--P. 483-484. To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence ... None of the facts, events, anomalies, or phenomena that have been listed, discussed, and analyzed in this book can be explained by airliner crashes, jet fuel fires, or any scheme of controlled demolition. A comparison of the 911 evidence collected with the evidence of results produced by the well-established Hutchison Effect shows that a similar technology was employed in the destruction of the towers ..."--Page 483-484 The billiard ball example The "jumpers" Magic shows and the power of suggestion The bathtub Seismic impact Conventional controlled demolition: "bombs in the buildings" Dustification Where did the buildings go? Holes Toasted cars Tissue beams and tortilla chips Weird fires Dust cloud rollout Fuzzballs Lather Perceptual conformity The Tesla-Hutchison Effect Hurricane Erin Earth's magnetic field on 9/11 Tesla-hurricane-magnetometer correlation Rolled-up carpets.