کشیدن فراتر از افق: نظریه‌ای چندبعدی از برنامه‌ریزی و حکمرانی فضایی

In this innovative work Jean Hillier develops a new theory for students and researchers of spatial planning and governance which is grounded primarily in the work of Gilles Deleuze. The theory recognizes the complex interrelation between place qualities and the multiple space-time relational dynamics of spatial governance. Using empirical examples from England and Australia, Hillier identifies the power of networks and trajectories through which various actors territorialize space and explores the social and political responsibilities of spatial managers and decision-makers. She considers what spatial planning and urban management practices could look like if they were to be developed along Deleuzean lines, and suggests alternative framings for spatial practice: broad trajectories or 'visions' of the longer-term future and shorter-term, location-specific detailed plans and projects with collaboratively determined tangible goals. Cover Half Title Dedication Title Page Copyright Page Table of Contents List of Figures List of Tables Preface: The Dilemma of a Middle, or, the Middle of a Dilemma Part 1: ‘A Thickness on Which Shadows Play’ 1 Shadows of the Future Introduction Crossing the Limits: ‘To think is to experiment’ Lines of Flight: Unsettling Shibboleths ‘Open to possibility’: Beyond Transcendence to Immanence Book Trajectory 2 Transdisciplinary Shadows Introduction Networks of Communicative/Collaborative Planning and Governance The Lack and the Constitutive Outside Representation and Perception Fluidity, Space and Time Complexity: ‘If things were simple, word would have gotten round’ Complexity Theories in Evolution Actant-Network Theory 3 ‘Following the Witch’s Flight’: Artfully Introducing Deleuzoguattarian Ideas Introduction Towards a Deleuzean-Inspired Conceptual Vocabulary Artful Illustrations: Multiplicity, Connection and Fragmentation Two Poststructuralist Applications: Analyses of Space and Governance Conclusions: Spatial Planning and Governance as Experimentation Part 2: Resonances, Interferences, Encounters and Connections 4 Sweeping the Dust of Fixities: Reconceptualising Time and Space in Planning and Governance Introduction: Once Upon a Time ... Kumarangk: Stories On Time: To Henri Bergson and Duration Time and Space Beyond Bergson Possibilities and Potentialities: Virtual Futures Conclusions: A Dash of Courage Too! 5 Land, Rights, Laws: Legalised Obliteration of Spatial Meanings, Knowledges and Beliefs Introduction Speaking of the Unspeakable Habermasian Analysis: The Power of Mediatisation Beyond Habermas Reconceptualising ‘Rules’ Conclusions 6 Woven, Knotted and Matted: Entangled Complex Systems and Non-Linear Dynamics of Space-Time Introduction Old-Growth Forests in South-West Western Australia Regimes of Signs Forests as Rhizomic Multiplicities Folds, Complications, Multiplications Constitutive Outsides Conclusions 7 On Justice Between Absence and Presence: The ‘Ghost Ships’ of Graythorp Introduction Ghosts Haunt Hartlepool Assemblages, Machines and Folds: A Deleuzoguattarian Frame On Social and Environmental Justice: ‘Ghost Fleet Torpedoed by Planning Wrangle’ Complex Foldings and Connections Oscillations and Perturbations Responsibility for Justice Conclusions: Just Ghosts in the Machine Part 3: Straddling the Abyss 8 Coming from the Outside of Thought: Problematising Representation as a Step Towards a Postrepresentational Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance Introduction What is Representation? Representation as Performative Some Problems with Representation What is Postrepresentation? Or, How might it be Possible to Think Beyond the Realm of Representation Shadow Worlds and Unstable Building Blocks: Nigel Thrift and Non-Representation Derrida and Foucault on Representation Deleuzean Representation, Clichés and Diagrams Postrepresentational Thinking: Planning and Governance as Open Wholes? 9 Planning and Governance as Speculative Experimentation: A Postrepresentational Theory Introduction Becoming-Planning, Becoming-Governance Spatial Planning and Urban Governance as Baroque? Planning as Speculation: A Postrepresentational Theory of Planning Multiplanar Spatial Planning: A Theory of Visual Dust and Sonic Echoes Working Towards Multiplanar Planning and Governance Dealing with Potential Criticism Non-Conclusions: Diagrams of Multiplanar Evolutionary Planning and Governance 10 Multiplanar Planning: Crossing the Threshold into Practice Introduction Baroque Spacing: Examples of Multiplanar Thinking Performance-Based Planning What Might Performance-Based Planning Do? Conclusions: A Practical Means of Going On 11 Turbulence within the Flow Introduction Multiplanar Planning and Governance; A Different Vision is Possible In-Conclusion: ‘Work in Progress’ References Index

in This Innovative Work Jean Hillier Develops A New Theory For Students And Researchers Of Spatial Planning And Governance Which Is Grounded Primarily In The Work Of Gilles Deleuze. The Theory Recognizes The Complex Interrelation Between Place Qualities And The Multiple Space-time Relational Dynamics Of Spatial Governance. Using Empirical Examples From England And Australia, Hillier Identifies The Power Of Networks And Trajectories Through Which Various Actors Territorialize Space And Explores The Social And Political Responsibilities Of Spatial Managers And Decision-makers. She Explores What Spatial Planning And Urban Management Practices Could Look Like If They Were To Become Along Deleuzean Lines And Suggests Alternative Framings For Spatial Practice: Broad Trajectories Or 'visions' Of The Longer-term Future And Shorter-term, Location-specific Detailed Plans And Projects With Collaboratively Determined Tangible Goals.

"Jean Hillier develops a new theory for students and researchers of spatial planning and governance which is grounded primarily in the work of Gilles Deleuze and which recognises the complex interrelation between place qualities and the multiple space-time relational dynamics of spatial governance. She identifies the power of networks and trajectories through which various actors territorialise space using empirical examples from England and Australia and explores the social and political responsibilities of spatial managers and decision-makers in a world in which places are parts of complex space- and power-geometries. She suggests alternative framings for spatial practice: broad trajectories or 'visions' of the longer-term future and shorter-term, location-specific detailed plans and projects with collaboratively determined tangible goals."--BOOK JACKET