Schopenhauer: A Consistent Reading (Studies in the History of Philosophy (Lewiston, N.Y.), V. 70.)

Neeley (philosophy, St. Francis U.) attempts to address the claims of inconsistency leveled against Schopenhauer's philosophical thinking. He defends Schopenhauer against a number of charges and argues against some attempts to absolve the philosopher of the charge of inconsistency through alterations of his views, aiming to clarify the meaning of his work on the basis of a close and detailed reading of The World as Will and Representation and his lesser-known works, as well as the English-language secondary literature on Schopenhauer. The volume's six chapters are all based on previously published articles which appeared in Idealistic Studies , Schopenhauer-Jehrbuch , and Diálogos . Double-spaced text. Annotation (c) Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com) Neeley (philosophy, St. Francis U.) attempts to address the claims of inconsistency leveled against Schopenhauer's philosophical thinking. He defends Schopenhauer against a number of charges and argues against some attempts to absolve the philosopher of the charge of inconsistency through alterations of his views, aiming to clarify the meaning of his work on the basis of a close and detailed reading of The World as Will and Representation and his lesser-known works, as well as the English-language secondary literature on Schopenhauer. The volume's six chapters are all based on previously published articles which appeared in Idealistic Studies, Schopenhauer-Jehrbuch, and Diálogos. Double-spaced text. Annotation ©2003 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR Last bit Most of It Part I 01 02 03 04 Part II 11 12 13 14 15 16 Part III 1 2 4 5 6 7 Last bit.pdf scan_uqcromus_2020-03-11-17-48-46