Reinforced Concrete and the Modernization of American Building, 1900-1930 (Johns Hopkins Studies in the History of Technology)

Dr. Slaton skillfully traces the evolution of modern building construction practice as well as the rise of the engineering field that made it possible. As an aside, she successfully argues that the emergence of modern architectural "design" was less of a european phenomenon than generally supposed. The research is thorough, and presented in a very entertaining fashion. The book's well worth the time and money. Examining The Proliferation Of Reinforced-concrete Construction In The United States After 1900, Amy E. Slaton Explores How Scientific Approaches And Occupations Displaced Traditionally Skilled Labor And How The Technology Of Concrete Buildings - Little Studied By Historians Of Engineering, Architecture, Or Industry - Offers A Case Study In The Modernization Of American Production. Based On A Wealth Of Data - Including University Curricula, Laboratory And Company Records, Organizational Proceedings, Blueprints, And Promotional Materials, As Well As A Body Of Physical Evidence Such As Tools, Instruments, Building Materials, And Surviving Reinforced-concrete Buildings - This Book Argues That Modern Mass Production In The United States Came About Not Simply In Answer To Manufacturers' Search For Profits, But As A Result Of A Complex Of Occupational And Cultural Factors.--jacket. Machine Generated Contents Note: Introduction -- Science And Commerce: Scenes From A Marriage 1 -- Chapter One -- Concrete Testing: The Academics At Work 20 -- Chapter Two -- Science On Site: The Field-testing And Regulation Of Concrete Construction 62 -- Chapter Three -- Science And The Fair Deal: Standards, Specifications, And Commercial Ambition 95 -- Chapter Four -- The Business Of Building: Technological And Managerial Techniques In Concrete Construction 127 -- Chapter Five -- What Modern Meant: Reinforced Concrete And The Social History Of Functionalist Design 168 -- Conclusion 188. Amy E. Slaton. Includes Bibliographical References (p. 195-236) And Index.

Examining the proliferation of reinforced-concrete construction in the United States after 1900, historian Amy E. Slaton considers how scientific approaches and occupations displaced traditionally skilled labor. The technology of concrete buildings—little studied by historians of engineering, architecture, or industry—offers a remarkable case study in the modernization of American production.

The use of concrete brought to construction the new procedures and priorities of mass production. These included a comprehensive application of science to commercial enterprise and vast redistributions of skills, opportunities, credit, and risk in the workplace. Reinforced concrete also changed the American landscape as building buyers embraced the architectural uniformity and simplicity to which the technology was best suited.

Based on a wealth of data that includes university curricula, laboratory and company records, organizational proceedings, blueprints, and promotional materials as well as a rich body of physical evidence such as tools, instruments, building materials, and surviving reinforced-concrete buildings, this book tests the thesis that modern mass production in the United States came about not simply in answer to manufacturers' search for profits, but as a result of a complex of occupational and cultural agendas.

Examining the proliferation of reinforced-concrete construction in the United States after 1900, historian Amy E. Slaton considers how scientific approaches and occupations displaced traditionally skilled labor. The technology of concrete buildings—little studied by historians of engineering, architecture, or industry—offers a remarkable case study in the modernization of American production. The use of concrete brought to construction the new procedures and priorities of mass production. These included a comprehensive application of science to commercial enterprise and vast redistributions of skills, opportunities, credit, and risk in the workplace. Reinforced concrete also changed the American landscape as building buyers embraced the architectural uniformity and simplicity to which the technology was best suited. Based on a wealth of data that includes university curricula, laboratory and company records, organizational proceedings, blueprints, and promotional materials as well as a rich body of physical evidence such as tools, instruments, building materials, and surviving reinforced-concrete buildings, this book tests the thesis that modern mass production in the United States came about not simply in answer to manufacturers' search for profits, but as a result of a complex of occupational and cultural agendas. "Examining the proliferation of reinforced-concrete construction in the United States after 1900, Amy E. Slaton explores how scientific approaches and occupations displaced traditionally skilled labor and how the technology of concrete buildings - little studied by historians of engineering, architecture, or industry - offers a case study in the modernization of American production.". "Based on a wealth of data - including university curricula, laboratory and company records, organizational proceedings, blueprints, and promotional materials, as well as a body of physical evidence such as tools, instruments, building materials, and surviving reinforced-concrete buildings - this book argues that modern mass production in the United States came about not simply in answer to manufacturers' search for profits, but as a result of a complex of occupational and cultural factors."--BOOK JACKET. Examining the proliferation of reinforced concrete construction in the US after 1900, the author considers how scientific approaches and occupations displaced traditionally skilled labour. She tests the thesis that modern mass production came about as a result of occupational and cultural agendas. There is a persistent tendency among educational analysts and historians to divide early-twentieth-century engineering fields into those based on conventional shop procedures-the so-called cut-and-try approaches to engineering-and those that developed more "scientific" methods.