Phantasia in Aristotle's Ethics: Reception in the Arabic, Greek, Hebrew and Latin Traditions (Bloomsbury Studies in the Aristotelian Tradition)

"In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle suggests that a moral principle 'does not immediately appear to the man who has been corrupted by pleasure or pain'. Phantasia in Aristotle's Ethics investigates his claim and its reception in ancient and medieval Aristotelian traditions, including Arabic, Greek, Hebrew and Latin. While contemporary commentators on the Ethics have overlooked Aristotle's remark, his ancient and medieval interpreters made substantial contributions towards a clarification of the claim's meaning and relevance. Even when the hazards of transmission have left no explicit comments on this particular passage, as is the case in the Arabic tradition, medieval responders still offer valuable interpretations of phantasia (appearance) and its role in ethical deliberation and action. This volume casts light on these readings, showing how the distant voices from the medieval Arabic, Greek, Hebrew and Latin Aristotelian traditions still contribute to contemporary debate concerning phantasia, motivation and deliberation in Aristotle's Ethics."--Bloomsbury Publishing. When accounting for phronesis in the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle makes the claim that `the principle does not immediately appear to the man who has been corrupted by pleasure or pain.' While contemporary commentators on the Ethics have virtually nothing to say about this, Aristotle's medieval interpreters in the Arabic, Greek, Hebrew and Latin traditions made substantial contributions towards a clarification of the claim's meaning and relevance. Phantasia in Aristotle's Ethics investigates both Aristotle's claim itself and its reception in various medieval Aristotelian traditions. Even when the hazards of transmission have left no explicit comments on this particular passage, as is the case in the Arabic tradition, Aristotle's commentators still offer valuable interpretations of phantasia (representation) and its role in deliberation and action. This volume casts light on these readings, showing how the distant voices from the medieval Arabic, Greek, Hebrew and Latin Aristotelian traditions still contribute substantially to contemporary debate concerning phantasia, motivation and deliberation in Aristotle's Ethics Cover Half-title Title Copyright Contents Preface 1. Introduction The Ancient Greek Tradition 2. ‘What Appears Good to Us’ in Aspasius andAlexander of Aphrodisias The Arabic Tradition 3. Averroes’s Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics The Medieval Greek Tradition 4. Eustratius of Nicaea on Nicomachean Ethics 6.5.1140b17–18 The Medieval Latin Tradition 5. Phronêsis, Pleasure and the Perception of the Goal The Medieval Hebrew Tradition 6. Reception and Interpretation of Aristotle’s Concept of Phantasia in the Hebrew Translations and Commentaries on Nicomachean Ethics 6.5.1140b16–17 and 1.13.1002b9–11 Aristotle and the Aristotelian Tradition 7. Aristotle on Deliberative Phantasia and Phronêsis Bibliography Index Locorum Index Nominum Index Rerum