Pesky Essays on the Logic of Philosophy (Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning Book 6)

This collection of essays explores the philosophy of human knowledge from a multitude of perspectives, with a particular emphasis upon the justification component of the classical analysis of knowledge, and with an excursion along the way to explore the role of knowledge in Texas Hold ℓ́ℓEm poker. An important theme of the collection is the role of knowledge in religion, including a detailed argument for agnosticism. A number of the essays touch upon issues in philosophical logic, among them a fascinating new counter-example to Modus Ponens. The collection is rounded out with essays on causality and the philosophy of mind. The authorℓ́ℓs perspective on the philosophy of human knowledge is fresh and challenging, as evidenced by essays entitled ℓ́ℓOn Epistemic Preferability;ℓ́ℓ ℓ́ℓOn Being Unjustified;ℓ́ℓ ℓ́ℓThe Logic of ℓ́ℓUnlessℓ́ℓℓ́ℓ and ℓ́ℓIs ℓ́ℓThis sentence is true.ℓ́ℓ True?ℓ́ℓ An interesting feature of The Logic of Philosophy: Pesky Essays is the inclusion of responses to several of its key essays, contributed by such prominent contemporary philosophers as Roderick Chisholm, Ted Sider and Tomas Kapitan Front Matter....Pages i-ix Front Matter....Pages 1-1 Essay #1: What Is Knowing?....Pages 3-19 Essay #2: Scales of Epistemic Appraisal....Pages 21-29 Essay #3: On Epistemic Preferability....Pages 31-37 Essay #4: On Being Unjustified....Pages 39-63 Essay #5: “I Should Have Known It!” Gilbert Ryle and Poker Knowledge....Pages 65-70 Front Matter....Pages 71-71 Essay #6: An Agnostic Argument....Pages 73-77 “Lucey’s Agnosticism: The Believer’s Reply” by Tomis Kapitan....Pages 79-82 Essay #7: Theism, Necessity and Invalidity....Pages 83-87 Essay #8: Logical Form and the Ontological Argument....Pages 89-101 Front Matter....Pages 103-103 Essay #9: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction....Pages 105-112 Essay #10: A New Counter-Example to Modus Ponens ....Pages 113-120 Comments on Lucey’s “An Invalid Instance of Modus Ponens” by Ted Sider....Pages 121-123 Essay #11: The Ancestral Relation Without Classes....Pages 125-129 Essay #12: Laws of Excluded Middle and a Temporal Dilemma....Pages 131-138 Essay #13: The Logic of ‘Unless’....Pages 139-141 Essay #14: Frankfurt on Why We Care About Truth: The Worlds of the Two Harrys....Pages 143-148 Front Matter....Pages 149-149 Essay #15: An Analysis of Causal Contribution (with co-authored Carol A. Lucey)....Pages 151-161 Essay #16: The Testability of the Identity Theory....Pages 163-168 Essay #17: On Being Purely Psychological....Pages 169-176 “Comments on Lucey’s Paper” by Roderick M. Chisholm (April 16, 1984)....Pages 177-180 Front Matter....Pages 149-149 Essay #18: On Ontological Parasites: Are Persons Entia Per Se ?....Pages 181-189 Essay #19: Is There a Set of All Truths?....Pages 191-193 Essay #20: The Generalization Argument Defended....Pages 195-209 Essay #21: Taxonomies & Teaching....Pages 211-217 Essay #22: Rudolf Carnap on False Propositions & Specificity....Pages 219-235 Back Matter....Pages 237-240 This collection of essays explores the philosophy of human knowledge from a multitude of perspectives, with a particular emphasis upon the justification component of the classical analysis of knowledge, and with an excursion along the way to explore the role of knowledge in Texas Hold ĺlEm poker. An important theme of the collection is the role of knowledge in religion, including a detailed argument for agnosticism. A number of the essays touch upon issues in philosophical logic, among them a fascinating new counter-example to Modus Ponens. The collection is rounded out with essays on causality and the philosophy of mind. The authorĺls perspective on the philosophy of human knowledge is fresh and challenging, as evidenced by essays entitled ĺlOn Epistemic Preferability;ĺl ĺlOn Being Unjustified;ĺl ĺlThe Logic of ĺlUnlessĺlĺl and ĺlIs ĺlThis sentence is true.ĺl True?ĺl An interesting feature of The Logic of Philosophy: Pesky Essays is the inclusion of responses to several of its key essays, contributed by such prominent contemporary philosophers as Roderick Chisholm, Ted Sider and Tomas Kapitan "This collection of essays explores the philosophy of human knowledge from a multitude of perspectives, with a particular emphasis upon the justification component of the classical analysis of knowledge, and with an excursion along the way to explore the role fo knowledge in Texas Hold 'Em poker. An important theme of the collection is the role of knowledge in religion, including a detailed argument for agnosticism. A number of the essays touch upon issues in philosophical logic, among them a fascinating new counter-example to Modus Ponens. The collection is rounded out with essays on causality and the philosophy of mind." -- Back cover