Paul Ricoeur's renewal of philosophical anthropology : vulnerability, capability, justice

In Paul Ricoeur's Renewal of Philosophical Anthropology: Vulnerability, Capability, Justice , Marc de Leeuw argues that Ricoeur’s philosophical project integrates the anthropological tradition while renewing its importance as a hermeneutic anthropology of human capability. Ricoeur posits that our cogito is neither its own absolute master, nor fully transparent to itself, inflicting a “wound” ( brisé ) and fracturing the center of Cartesian self-certainty. But the Nietzschean disillusionment that ensues does not simply amount to a victorious anti-cogito; it opens another path towards self-understanding. In place of the direct route of intuition is found a more complex way forward, one guided by interpretation. The task of philosophical anthropology is to understand the human through its interpretative, critical, and imaginative ability as well as its capacity to act towards, with, and for others; the interpretation of the world in front of us, the interpretation of “who we are,” and the interpretation of what it means to be among others (as "other selves") coalesces in an anthropology that binds the question of the self to a moral, ethical, and political project, one aiming to reflect our existence-in-common. For Ricoeur, the basic question of our subjective and normative “standing” demands a fundamental response—a response toward our own otherness and to responsibilities triggered by the appeal of Others. In both cases, our vulnerability is inescapable: we can never have an absolute self-knowledge nor an absolute knowledge of Others. Ricoeur turns this fundamental aporia into an affirmative philosophical anthropology of human action, attestation, and justice. "In Paul Ricoeur's Renewal of Philosophical Anthropology: Vulnerability, Capability, Justice, Marc de Leeuw contextualizes Ricoeur's work in the largely forgotten tradition of philosophical anthropology. In the book, de Leeuw shows how the original diagnosis of the human as suffering from a primordial deficiency, lack, or "wounded cogito" becomes the main motivation for Ricoeur's phenomenological and hermeneutic renewal of this tradition. Ricoeur thereby connects the human ability for self-expression with our capability to speak, act, narrate, remember, and be held accountable. De Leeuw argues that through the poetic and ethical reconfiguration of our experiences a reflexive selfhood emerges, one able to attest to whom it "stands for," thereby replacing the traditional anthropological question "what is the human?" with "who is the human?" In times of climate change, viral emergency, and democratic crisis, the "question of the human" is more important than ever. How does our philosophical self-understanding match the urgent need to re-evaluate our relation to the planet, nature, and each other? Paul Ricoeur's complex exploration of the vulnerable but capable human helps us formulate an answer. Paul Ricoeur's Renewal of Philosophical Anthropology shows that Ricoeur's affirmative anthropology not only renews the tradition of philosophical anthropology but also reveals its ongoing relevance for our human self-understanding"-- Provided by publisher Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Part I. ANTHROPOLOGY: THE QUESTION OF THE HUMAN Ch01. The German School of Philosophical Anthropology Ch02. Philosophical Anthropology as Existential Phenomenology Part II. POETICS: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL HERMENEUTIC OF HUMAN SELF-EXPRESSION Ch03. Time, Being, and Narrative Ch04. Persons, Selfhood, and Otherness Ch05. Remembering, Forgetting, and Historicity Part III. ETHICS: A LIFE LIVED WITH AND FOR OTHERS Ch06. Moral Imperatives, Solicitude, and Critical Phronesis Ch07. The Just, Forgiveness, and Unconditional Affirmation Conclusion Notes Bibliography Index About the Author