Oral Arguments and Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court Suny Series in American Constitutionalism

How oral arguments influence the decisions of Supreme Court justices.Timothy R. Johnson focuses on an all-too-often ignored aspect of the Supreme Court's decision-making process by providing a systematic explanation of how justices use oral arguments to make substantive legal and policy decisions. Using the arguments filed to the Court in legal briefs, oral argument transcripts, notes taken by Justice Lewis F. Powell during oral arguments, conference notes and internal memos of justices, and Court opinions, the book analyzes justices'behavior during these proceedings. The result is an impressive account demonstrating that justices use oral arguments to gather information regarding legal and policy options in a case, the preferences of competing political institutions and actors, and institutional rules that might affect the choices they make.Timothy R. Johnson is Morse Alumni Distinguished Teaching Professor of Political Science at the University of Minnesota at Twin Cities. He is the coauthor (with Christopher P. Gilbert, David A. M. Peterson, and Paul A. Djupe) of Religious Institutions and Minor Parties in the United States. Timothy R. Johnson Focuses On An All-too-often Ignored Aspect Of The Supreme Court's Decision-making Process By Providing A Systematic Explanation Of How Justices Use Oral Arguments Of Make Substantive Legal And Policy Decisions. Using The Arguments Filed To The Court In Legal Briefs, Oral Argument Transcripts, Notes Taken By Justice Lewis F. Powell During Oral Arguments, Conference Notes And Internal Memos Of Justices, And Court Opinions, The Book Analyses Justices' Behavior During These Proceedings. The Result As An Account Demonstrating That Justices Use Oral Arguments To Gather Information Regarding Legal And Policy Options In A Case, The Preferences Of Competing Political Institutions And Actors, And Institutional Rules That Might Affect The Choices They Make.--book Jacket. Oral Arguments As An Information-gathering Tool -- Oral Arguments And Coalition Formation -- Conference, Opinion Writing, And Oral Arguments -- Oral Arguments And Decisions On The Merits -- Conclusions And Implications -- Data Selection -- Date Reliability -- Example Of Justice Powell's Oral Argument Notes From Chapter 3. Timothy R. Johnson. Includes Bibliographical References (p. 157-166) And Index.

How oral arguments influence the decisions of Supreme Court justices.

Timothy R. Johnson focuses on an all-too-often ignored aspect of the Supreme Court's decision-making process by providing a systematic explanation of how justices use oral arguments to make substantive legal and policy decisions. Using the arguments filed to the Court in legal briefs, oral argument transcripts, notes taken by Justice Lewis F. Powell during oral arguments, conference notes and internal memos of justices, and Court opinions, the book analyzes justices' behavior during these proceedings. The result is an impressive account demonstrating that justices use oral arguments to gather information regarding legal and policy options in a case, the preferences of competing political institutions and actors, and institutional rules that might affect the choices they make.