OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project Making Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective, Action 14 - 2015 Final Report

Annotation Improving dispute resolution mechanisms is an integral component of the work on BEPS. The measures developed under Action 14 of the BEPS Project and contained in this report aim to minimize the risks of uncertainty and unintended double taxation. They do so by ensuring the consistent and proper implementation of tax treaties, including the effective and timely resolution of disputes regarding their interpretation or application through the mutual agreement procedure. Countries have agreed to important changes in their approach to dispute resolution, such as a minimum standard with respect to the resolution of treaty-related disputes. They have committed to its rapid implementation and agreed to ensure its effective implementation through the establishment of a robust peer-based monitoring mechanism. A large group of countries has also committed to provide for mandatory binding arbitration in their bilateral tax treaties as a mechanism to guarantee that treaty-related disputes will be resolved within a specified timeframe. Read more... This report is the result of the work carried out on Action 14. The report reflects a commitment by countries to implement a minimum standard on dispute resolution, consisting of specific measures to remove obstacles to an effective and efficient mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The report also reflects agreement by countries to establish a monitoring mechanism to ensure that the commitments contained in the minimum standard are effectively satisfied. The minimum standard, complementary best practices and resulting changes to the OECD Model Tax Convention (OECD, 2014) are set out in detail in Sections I.A and I.B of this report. The framework for a peer-based monitoring mechanism is set out in Section I.C of this report. The conclusions of the work on Action 14 also reflect the agreement that certain responses to the obstacles that prevent the resolution of treaty-related disputes through the mutual agreement procedure are more appropriately presented as best practices, in general because, unlike the elements of the minimum standard, these best practices have a subjective or qualitative character that could not readily be monitored or evaluated or because not all OECD and G20 countries are willing to commit to them at this stage. These best practices are therefore not part of the minimum standard. The best practices are accompanied by explanations and, in some cases, changes to the OECD Model Tax Convention. Finally, the agreement to a minimum standard that will make tax treaty dispute resolution mechanisms more effective is complemented by the commitment, by a number of countries, to adopt mandatory binding arbitration. Whilst there is currently no consensus among all OECD and G20 countries on the adoption of mandatory binding arbitration as a mechanism to ensure the timely resolution of MAP cases, a significant group of countries has committed to adopt and implement mandatory binding arbitration. This commitment to MAP arbitration is set out in Section II of this report L'amélioration des mécanismes de règlement des différends fait partie intégrante des travaux sur le BEPS. Les mesures élaborées dans le cadre de l'action 14 du Plan BEPS et décrites dans ce rapport visent à réduire les risques d'incertitude et de double imposition involontaire en garantissant une application cohérente et correcte des conventions fiscales, notamment grâce à un règlement efficace et rapide par la procédure amiable des différends liés à l'interprétation ou à l'application des conventions. Les pays ont accepté d'apporter des modifications importantes à leur propre mode de règlement des différends, en particulier, en élaborant une norme a minima en matière de règlement des différends relatifs aux conventions, qu'ils se sont engagés à mettre en œuvre rapidement et efficacement au moyen d'un mécanisme fiable de suivi exercé par les pairs. En outre, un grand nombre de pays se sont déjà engagés à introduire une clause d'arbitrage obligatoire et contraignante dans leurs conventions fiscales bilatérales en tant que moyen pour garantir que les différends relatifs aux conventions seront réglés dans les délais impartis