Misogynous Economies: The Business Of Literature In Eighteenth-century Britain Project Muse Upcc Books

The eighteenth century saw the birth of the concept of literature as business: literature critiqued and promoted capitalism, and books themselves became highly marketable canonical objects. During this period, misogynous representations of women often served to advance capitalist desires and to redirect feelings of antagonism toward the emerging capitalist order. Misogynous Economies proposes that oppression of women may not have been the primary goal of these misogynistic depictions. Using psychoanalytic concepts developed by Julia Kristeva, Mandell argues that passionate feelings about the alienating socioeconomic changes brought on by capitalism were displaced onto representations that inspired hatred of women and disgust with the female body. Such displacements also played a role in canon formation. The accepted literary canon resulted not simply from choices made by eighteenth-century critics but also, as Mandell argues, from editorial and production practices designed to stimulate readers' desires to identify with male poets. Mandell considers a range of authors, from Dryden and Pope to Anna Letitia Barbauld, throughout the eighteenth century. She also reconsiders Augustan satire, offering a radically new view that its misogyny is an attempt to resist the commodification of literature. Mandell shows how misogyny was put to use in public discourse by a culture confronting modernization and resisting alienation. The Eighteenth Century Saw The Birth Of The Concept Of Literature As Business: Literature Critiqued And Promoted Capitalism, And Books Themselves Became Highly Marketable Canonical Objects. During This Period, Misogynous Representations Of Women Often Served To Advance Capitalist Desires And To Redirect Feelings Of Antagonism Toward The Emerging Capitalist Order. Misogynous Economies Proposes That Oppression Of Women May Not Have Been The Primary Goal Of These Misogynistic Depictions. Using Psychoanalytic Concepts Developed By Julia Kristeva, Mandell Argues That Passionate Feelings About The Alienating Socioeconomic Changes Brought On By Capitalism Were Displaced Onto Representations That Inspired Hatred Of Women And Disgust With The Female Body. Such Displacements Also Played A Role In Canon Formation. The Accepted Literary Canon Resulted Not Simply From Choices Made By Eighteenth-century Critics But Also, As Mandell Argues, From Editorial And Production Practices Designed To Stimulate Readers' Desires To Identify With Male Poets.--jacket. Misogyny And Literariness: Dryden, Pope, And Swift -- Capitalism And Rape: Thomas Otway's The Orphan -- Engendering Capitalist Desire: Filthy Bawds And Thoroughly Good Merchants In Mandeville And Lillo -- Misogyny And Feminism: Mary Leapor -- Misogyny And The Canon: The Character Of Women In Anthologies Of Poetry -- Transcending Misogyny: Anna Letitia Barbauld Writes Her Way Out. Laura Mandell. Includes Bibliographical References (p. 159-211) And Index.

The eighteenth century saw the birth of the concept of literature as business: literature critiqued and promoted capitalism, and books themselves became highly marketable canonical objects. During this period, misogynous representations of women often served to advance capitalist desires and to redirect feelings of antagonism toward the emerging capitalist order. Misogynous Economies proposes that oppression of women may not have been the primary goal of these misogynistic depictions.

Using psychoanalytic concepts developed by Julia Kristeva, Mandell argues that passionate feelings about the alienating socioeconomic changes brought on by capitalism were displaced onto representations that inspired hatred of women and disgust with the female body. Such displacements also played a role in canon formation. The accepted literary canon resulted not simply from choices made by eighteenth-century critics but also, as Mandell argues, from editorial and production practices designed to stimulate readers' desires to identify with male poets.

Mandell considers a range of authors, from Dryden and Pope to Anna Letitia Barbauld, throughout the eighteenth century. She also reconsiders Augustan satire, offering a radically new view that its misogyny is an attempt to resist the commodification of literature. Mandell shows how misogyny was put to use in public discourse by a culture confronting modernization and resisting alienation.

"The eighteenth century saw the birth of the concept of literature as business: literature critiqued and promoted capitalism, and books themselves became highly marketable canonical objects. During this period, misogynous representations of women often served to advance capitalist desires and to redirect feelings of antagonism toward the emerging capitalist order."--BOOK JACKET. "Misogynous Economies proposes that oppression of women may not have been the primary goal of these misogynistic depictions. Using psychoanalytic concepts developed by Julia Kristeva, Mandell argues that passionate feelings about the alienating socioeconomic changes brought on by capitalism were displaced onto representations that inspired hatred of women and disgust with the female body. Such displacements also played a role in canon formation. The accepted literary canon resulted not simply from choices made by eighteenth-century critics but also, as Mandell argues, from editorial and production practices designed to stimulate readers' desires to identify with male poets."--BOOK JACKET.