Maimonides and St. Thomas on the Limits of Reason (SUNY Series in Philosophy)

This book shows that Maimonides and St. Thomas reached strikingly similar conclusions regarding the limits of reason and that these limits, in turn, show the dimensions of philosophical understanding.Through a comparative philosophical examination of the diverse aporiae constituting the question of “providence,” the author seeks to determine the degree of philosophical compatibility between Maimonides and St. Thomas Aquinas, and where disagreement is evident, its origin, nature and philosophical consequences. Dobbs-Weinstein retrieves some occluded aspects of their thought that render a better understanding of each thinker and provide a richer philosophical vocabulary for discussions of the limits of “reason,” the consequent inevitable limits of language and interpretation and, above all, the relation between knowing and acting.This study also shows how and why, despite the fact that they adopt some radically different ontological principles, Maimonides and Aquinas reach strikingly similar conclusions concerning the existential dimensions of human life, especially the possibilities and modes of knowledge and the actions consequent upon them.Idit Dobbs-Weinstein is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Vanderbilt University. Table of Contents Maimonides and St. Thomas on the Limits of Reason by Dobbs-Weinstein, Idit Terms of Use Apologia and Acknowledgments Abbreviations Introduction 1 Maimonides and Aquinas as Interpreters The Development of Philosophical, Biblical Exegesis Maimonides' and Aquinas' Approaches to Interpretation Interpretation as a Philosophical Practice 2 The Book of Job Early Approaches to the Book of Job The Nature of the Inquiry Maimonides' Account of Job Aquinas' Exposition on Job 3 The Account of the Beginning or Creation Introduction Maimonides' Arguments for Creation Aquinas' Arguments for Creation 4 Matter, Privation, and Evil Introduction Maimonides' Ambivalence Toward Matter Aquinas' Understanding of Matter, Privation, and Evil 5 Natural Human Perfection and Its Limits Introduction The Nature of the Human Soul According to Maimonides Aquinas and the Harmony of the Soul Conclusion 6 Divine Law as a Perfection of Philosophical Ethics Introduction The Limits of Philosophical Ethics According to Maimonides Divine Sanction as Universal Imperative The Limits of Legislative Reason The Displacement of Legislative Reason by Divine Law Conclusion 7 Hubris, Knowledge, and Provident Participation Introduction The Problem of Job Modes of Participating Providence Conclusion: Excess and Reticence Endnotes Bibliography Name Index Subject Index Descriptive content provided by Syndetics"! a Bowker service Through A Comparative Philosophical Examination Of The Diverse Aporiae Constituting The Question Of Providence, The Author Seeks To Determine The Degree Of Philosophical Compatibility Between Maimonides And St. Thomas Aquinas, And Where Disagreement Is Evident, Its Origin, Nature And Philosophical Consequences. Dobbs-weinstein Retrieves Some Occluded Aspects Of Their Thought That Render A Better Understanding Of Each Thinker And Provide A Richer Philosophical Vocabulary For Discussions Of The Limits Of Reason, The Consequent Inevitable Limits Of Language And Interpretation And, Above All, The Relation Between Knowing And Acting. This Study Also Shows How And Why, Despite The Fact That They Adopt Some Radically Different Ontological Principles, Maimonides And Aquinas Reach Strikingly Similar Conclusions Concerning The Existential Dimensions Of Human Life, Especially The Possibilities And Modes Of Knowledge And The Actions Consequent Upon Them. 1. Maimonides And Aquinas As Interpreters -- 2. The Book Of Job -- 3. The Account Of The Beginning Or Creation -- 4. Matter, Privation, And Evil -- 5. Natural Human Perfection And Its Limits -- 6. Divine Law As A Perfection Of Philosophical Ethics -- 7. Hubris, Knowledge, And Provident Participation. Idit Dobbs-weinstein. Includes Bibliographical References (p.[261]-272) And Indexes. This book shows that Maimonides and St. Thomas reached strikingly similar conclusions regarding the limits of reason and that these limits, in turn, show the dimensions of philosophical understanding. Through a comparative philosophical examination of the diverse aporiae constituting the question of "providence", the author seeks to determine the degree of philosophical compatibility between Maimonides and St. Thomas Aquinas, and where disagreement is evident, its origin, nature and philosophical consequences. Dobbs-Weinstein retrieves some occluded aspects of their thought that render a better understanding of each thinker and provide a richer philosophical vocabulary for discussions of the limits of "reason", the consequent inevitable limits of language and interpretation and, above all, the relation between knowing and acting. This study also shows how and why, despite the fact that they adopt some radically different ontological principles, Maimonides and Aquinas reach strikingly similar conclusions concerning the existential dimensions of human life, especially the possibilities and modes of knowledge and the actions consequent upon them.