لیبرترین‌گرایی دفاع شده

Ever since the publication in 1974 of Robert Nozick's 'Anarchy, State and Utopia', libertarianism has been much discussed within political philosophy, science and economy circles. Yet libertarianism has been so strongly identified with Nozick's version of it that little attention has been devoted to other than Nozick's ideas and arguments. While Nozick's version of libertarianism has preoccupied the academic discussion Nozick himself has not responded to the many criticisms raised and yet other defenders of libertarianism have not remained silent. Jan Narveson, Loren Lomasky, Eric Mack, Douglas Rasmussen, Douglas Den Uyl and many others have contributed many impressive arguments of their own in support of the libertarian idea that a political system is just when it successfully secures the rights of individuals understood within the Lockean classical liberal tradition. In this book, Tibor R. Machan analyses the state-of-the-debate on libertarianism post Nozick. Going far beyond, the often cursory treatment of libertarianism in major books and other publications, he examines closely the alternative non-Nozickian defenses of libertarianism that have been advanced and, by applying these arguments to innumerable policy areas in the field, Machan achieves a new visibility and prominence for libertarianism.

Ever since the publication in 1974 of Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia, libertarianism has been much discussed within political philosophy, science and economy circles. Yet libertarianism has been so strongly identified with Nozick's version of it that little attention has been devoted to other than Nozick's ideas and arguments. While Nozick's version of libertarianism has preoccupied the academic discussion Nozick himself did not respond to the many criticisms raised and yet other defenders of libertarianism have not remained silent. Jan Narveson, Loren Lomasky, Eric Mack, Douglas Rasmussen, Douglas Den Uyl and many others have contributed impressive arguments of their own in support of the libertarian idea that a political system is just when it successfully secures the rights of individuals understood within the Lockean classical liberal tradition.

In this book Tibor R. Machan analyses the state of the debate on libertarianism post Nozick. Going far beyond the often cursory treatment of libertarianism in major books and other publications he examines closely the alternative non-Nozickian defenses of libertarianism that have been advanced and, by applying these arguments to innumerable policy areas in the field, Machan achieves a new visibility and prominence for libertarianism.

Ever since the publication in 1974 of Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia, libertarianism has been much discussed within political philosophy, science and economy circles. Yet libertarianism has been so strongly identified with Nozick's version of it that little attention has been devoted to other than Nozick's ideas and arguments. While Nozick's version of libertarianism has preoccupied the academic discussion Nozick himself did not respond to the many criticisms raised and yet other defenders of libertarianism have not remained silent. Jan Narveson, Loren Lomasky, Eric Mack, Douglas Rasmussen, Douglas Den Uyl and many others have contributed impressive arguments of their own in support of the libertarian idea that a political system is just when it successfully secures the rights of individuals understood within the Lockean classical liberal tradition. In this book Tibor R. Machan analyses the state of the debate on libertarianism post Nozick. Going far beyond the often cursory treatment of libertarianism in major books and other publications he examines closely the alternative non-Nozickian defenses of libertarianism that have been advanced and, by applying these arguments to innumerable policy areas in the field, Machan achieves a new visibility and prominence for libertarianism. Is It Responsible To Be Free? -- The Principles Of The Declaration : Here To Stay? -- Justice, Self, And Natural Rights -- Individualism And The Vitality Of Community Life -- Economics And Human Values -- Finding The Rational Man -- A Positive Libertarian View Of Government -- Liberalism And Atomistic Individualism -- Anarchists And Minarchists : Allies After All? -- Robert Nozick And The Libertarian Alternative -- Will Technology Make Us Free? -- How Critical Is Critical Legal Studies? -- Should You Apologize? -- Between Parent And Child -- Should Ads For Hazardous Goods Be Banned? -- The Ideology Of Death That Will Not Die -- Libertarianism And Conservatism -- Socialism Redux On The Horizon -- Two Philosophers Skeptical Of Negative Liberty -- Does Libertarianism Imply The Welfare State? -- Democracy In Public Life And Corporate Management -- Dependence Of Equality On Liberty -- Why Agreement Isn't Enough -- Against Fairness. Tibor R. Machan. Includes Bibliographical References And Index. Is it responsible to be free? The principles of the declaration : here to stay? Justice, self, and natural rights Individualism and the vitality of community life Economics and human values Finding the rational man A positive libertarian view of government Libertarianism and atomistic individualism Anarchists and minarchists : allies after all? Robert Nozick and the libertarian alternative Will technology make us free? How critical is critical legal studies? Should you apologize? Between parent and child Should hazardous goods be banned? The ideology of death that will not die Libertarianism and conservatism Socialism redux on the horizon Two philosophers skeptical of negative liberty Does libertarianism imply the welfare state? Democracy in public affairs and corporate governance Dependence of equality on liberty Why agreement isn't enough. Annotation Despite growing concern with the effects of concurrent task demands on human performance, and research demonstrating that these demands are associated with vulnerability to error, so far there has been only limited research into the nature and range of concurrent task demands in real-world settings. This book presents a set of NASA studies that characterize the nature of concurrent task demands confronting airline flight crews in routine operations, as opposed to emergency situations. The authors analyze these demands in light of what is known about cognitive processes, particularly those of attention and memory, with the focus upon inadvertent omissions of intended actions by skilled pilots