Les Commentaires de Simplicius et de Jean Philopon à  la "Physique" d'Aristote: Tradition et Innovation (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca Et Byzantina, Quellen and Studien) (French Edition)

In Greek Late Antiquity philosophy defined itself above all through the interpretation of authoritative texts such as Platos dialogues or the treatises of Aristotle. This work looks at the last Late Antique commentaries on Aristotles Physics, the pagan Simplicius and the Christian Philoponus (both 6th cent. AD). Golitsis demonstrates how differently the two contemporaries interpreted the philosophical tradition and how this led them to deducedifferent routes to finding the truth.;Cover -- Table des Mati232;res -- Introduction -- Chapitre 1. La tradition scolaire ou les pr233;suppos233;s p233;dagogiques -- Chapitre 2. La tradition commentariste ou les pr233;suppos233;s ex233;g233;tiques -- Chapitre 3. La tradition livresque ou le mat233;riau bibliographique -- Chapitre 4. Les digressions : esquisse dune typologie -- Chapitre 5. Analyse des digressions -- Chapitre 6. Les fondements et la finalit233; des digressions : divergences dorientation dans lantiquit233; finissante -- Backmatter13. Introduction -- Ptie 1. Repérer La Tradition Dans Les Commentaires. La Tradition Scolaire Ou Les Présupposés Pédagogiques ; La Tradition Commentariste Ou Les Présupposés Exégétiques ; La Tradition Livresque Ou Le Matériau Bibliographique -- Ptie 2. Les Digressions : Lieux De Réflexion Personnelle Et Moyens D'innovation Philosophique. Les Digressions : Esquisse D'une Typologie ; Analyse Des Digressions ; Les Fondements Et La Finalité Des Digressions : Divergences D'orientation Dans L'antiquité Finissante -- En Guise De Conclusion : Une Divergence Convergente -- Appendice. Les Digressions Traduites Et Annotées. Par Pantelis Golitsis. Includes Bibliographical References (pages 281-291) And Indexes.

In Greek Late Antiquity philosophy defined itself above all through the interpretation of authoritative texts such as Plato’s dialogues or the treatises of Aristotle.

This work looks at the last Late Antique commentaries on Aristotle’s Physics, the pagan Simplicius and the Christian Philoponus (both 6th cent. AD). Golitsis demonstrates how differently the two contemporaries interpreted the philosophical tradition and how this led them to deducedifferent routes to finding the truth.

In Greek Late Antiquity philosophy defined itself above all through the interpretation of authoritative texts such as Plato's dialogues or the treatises of Aristotle. This work looks at the last Late Antique commentaries on Aristotle's Physics, the pagan Simplicius and the Christian Philoponus (both 6th cent. AD). Golitsis demonstrates how differently the two contemporaries interpreted the philosophical tradition and how this led them to deduce different routes to finding the truth. Frontmatter 1 Table des Matières 7 Introduction 11 Chapitre 1. La tradition scolaire ou les présupposés pédagogiques 17 Chapitre 2. La tradition commentariste ou les présupposés exégétiques 48 Chapitre 3. La tradition livresque ou le matériau bibliographique 75 Chapitre 4. Les digressions : esquisse d’une typologie 93 Chapitre 5. Analyse des digressions 99 Chapitre 6. Les fondements et la finalité des digressions : divergences d’orientation dans l’antiquité finissante 206 Backmatter 217 In Greek Late Antiquity philosophy defined itself above all through the interpretation of authoritative texts such as Plato's dialogues or the treatises of Aristotle. This work looks at the last Late Antique commentaries on Aristotle's Physics, the pagan Simplicius and the Christian Philoponus (both 6th cent. AD). Golitsis demonstrates how differently the two contemporaries interpreted the philosophical tradition and how this led them to deduce different routes to finding the truth. The volumes of the series Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et Byzantina. Sources and Studies, will present and interpret Greek textual sources on the transmission and reception of Aristotle from late antiquity to the Byzantine middle ages and the Renaissance era applying philological, historical, and exegetical methods. Hyperlink to Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et Byzantina. Series academica: https://www.degruyter.com/view/serial/CAGBSA-B Review text: " ... a valuable account of some central issues in the study of two major Aristotelian commentators."Robert B. Todd in: BMCR 2009.04.76 " ... G. [hat] einen weiteren Baustein zum besseren Verständnis der spätantiken Kommentartradition vorgelegt ... "Matthias Perkams in: Gnomon83/2 (2011)