Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science: Rationality without Foundations (Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 5)

No disrespect to Mr. Gottei, but if I want to know what Karl Popper said or thinks, I'll read Popper and I recommend the same to others. Besides, reading Popper, by Popper himself, is by far cheaper than reading Gottei. And, if Popper can't expresses himself properly, how can Gottei?

This book seeks to rectify misrepresentations of Popperian thought with a historical approach to Popper’s philosophy, an approach which applies his own mature view, that we gain knowledge through conjectures and refutations, to his own development, by portraying him in his intellectual growth as just such a series. Gattei seeks to reconstruct the logic of Popper’s development, in order to show how one problem and its tentative solution led to a new problem.

Introduction: Critical Rationalism -- Young Popper's Intellectual Revolution -- Science And Philosophy -- Metaphysics -- Popper And Kuhn : Clashing Metaphysics -- The Ethical Nature Of Popper's Understanding Of Rationality. Stefano Gattei. Includes Bibliographical References (p. [117]-127) And Indexes. Content: Introduction: Critical Rationalism Chapter 1: Young Popper's Intellectual Revolution Chapter 2: Science and Philosophy Chapter 3: Metaphysics Chapter 4: Popper and Kuhn: Clashing Metaphysics Chapter 5: The Ethical Nature of Popper's Understanding of Rationality Stefano Gattei reconstructs the development of Karl Popper's logic to highlight how one problem and its tentative solution led to a new problem. He seeks to rectify misrepresentations of Popperian thought with a historical approach to his philisophy Rectifying misrepresentations of Popperian thought with a historical approach to Popper's philosophy, Gattei reconstructs the logic of Popper's development to show how one problem and its tentative solution led to a new problem.