Judicial Reconstruction And The Rule Of Law: Reassessing Military Intervention In Iraq And Beyond (international Humanitarian Law)

Challenging the dominant rhetoric of international rule of law operations, this work reasserts the centrality of the community in building its own relationship with law, counselling military interveners to refocus exclusively on restoring security using their extraordinary powers under international law. The Idea Of Building A Blueprint 'rule Of Law' Through Military Intervention Has Seized The Imagination Of Practitioners And Theorists Alike In The Past Decade Of Peacebuilding Operations, And An Emphasis On Simultaneous Judicial Reconstruction And Security Sector Reform Has Emerged As Their Central Strategy. This Work, In A Fresh Approach Based On Recent Military Operations In Iraq And Beyond, Challenges Both The Universality Of The Blueprint And The Doctrinal Assumption That Institutional Reform By Military Interveners Builds Peace And Legitimacy. In A Comprehensive Review, The Essential Role Of The Community In Developing Its Own Relationship With Law, While Interveners Refocus Exclusively On Restoring Public Security Using Their Extraordinary Powers Under International Humanitarian Law, Emerges As The Only Future For 'rule Of Law Operations'--p. [4] Of Cover. The Rule Of Law In International Law-a Reassessment -- The General Legislative Competence Of An Occupant As To The Domestic Rule Of Law -- The Administration Of Judicial Institutions Under The Law Of Occupation -- Security Council Interventions Outside An Explicit Occupation Framework. By Angeline Lewis. Includes Bibliographical References (pages 219-236) And Index. La 4e de couverture indique : "The idea of building a blueprint 'rule of law' through military intervention has seized the imagination of practitioners and theorists alike in the past decade of peacebuilding operations, and an emphasis on simultaneous judicial reconstruction and security sector reform has emerged as their central strategy. This work, in a fresh approach based on recent military operations in Iraq and beyond, challenges both the universality of the blueprint and the doctrinal assumption that institutional reform by military interveners builds peace and legitimacy. In a comprehensive review, the essential role of the community in developing its own relationship with law, while interveners refocus exclusively on restoring public security using their extraordinary powers under international humanitarian law, emerges as the only future for 'rule of law operations.'"