Human caused global warming : the biggest deception in history : the why, what, where, when, and how it was achieved

This book examines the claims of human induced global warming made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) using proper journalistic and investigative techniques. It explains how it was a premeditated, orchestrated deception, using science to impose a political agenda. It fooled a majority including most scientists. They assumed that other scientists would not produce science for a political agenda. German Physicist and meteorologist Klaus-Eckart Puls finally decided to look for himself. Here is what he discovered.Ten years ago I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data—first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it....scientifically it is sheer absurdity to think we can get a nice climate by turning a CO2 adjustment knob.This book uses the same approach used in investigative journalism. It examines the Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How. Preface Dedication Human Caused Global Warming The Biggest Deception In History Why? What Is Normal? 97% Consensus (The Actual # is 0.3%) Paradigm Shift: Environmentalism Exploitation of Complexity Moving Goalposts Lack of Knowledge of History of Climate Change Ice Sheets Just 18,000 Years Ago Sea Level Change Northern Hemisphere Temperature for Last 10,000 Years – the Holocene Optimum The Instrumental Global Temperature Record IPCC Temperature Projections Versus Reality Computer Models: Gospel In Gospel Out (GIGO) IPCC Computer Models: Average of Averages Inability to Forecast Weather and Climate Exploitation of Public Lack of Knowledge and Emotions Measures of Public Climate Knowledge Climategate Cover Up Misinformation About Severe Weather Arctic Ice: A Classic Example of Exploitation What Is Normal for Annual Arctic Ice Melt You Need a Threatened Animal to Raise Emotional Quotient The Greenhouse Effect Deliberate Deception of Public Perception Early Conflicting Evidence Rewriting History–The Troubling Diagram CO2 and Temperature Over 600 Million Years Adjusting the Data to Prove the Hypothesis Stations Chosen to Create the Record Data Manipulation Adjusting the Data to Fit the Hypothesis Changing the IPCC Reports Santer’s Insertions Troublesome Graphs The Actual Diagram Omissions: It’s The Sun, Stupid The Milankovitch Effect The Cosmic Theory Historic Evidence The Circumpolar Vortex Social and Economic Damage WHO? Maurice Strong John Holdren Al Gore WHAT? Underlying Motivation: Over-population Overpopulation Claims in the 20th Century The World is Not Overpopulated! HOW Achieving The Goal Bureaucracy Organizational Chart: A Bureaucrat’s Delight How Politicians and Bureaucrats Deflect, But Retain Control Structure of The IPCC How So Few Fooled So Many Evidence of The Political Objective The Precautionary Principle Discussion A Few Important Definitions General References Copyright This book examines the claims of human induced global warming made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) using proper journalistic and investigative techniques. It explains how it was a premeditated, orchestrated deception, using science to impose a political agenda. It fooled a majority including most scientists. They assumed that other scientists would not produce science for a political agenda. German Physicist and meteorologist Klaus-Eckart Puls finally decided to look for himself. Here is what he discovered. Ten years ago I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and datafirst I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.scientifically it is sheer absurdity to think we can get a nice climate by turning a CO2 adjustment knob. This book uses the same approach used in investigative journalism. It examines the Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How.