History Fiction Or Science Vol. 3; Astronomical methods applied to chronology. Ptolemy`s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs.

Astronomical methods applied to chronology. Ptolemy`s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. Dr. Prof Anatoly Fomenko and team dissect Almagest of ancient Ptolemy compiled allegedly in 150 a.d. and considered to be the cornerstone of classical history. Their report states: Almagest was compiled in XVI-XVII from astronomical data of IX-XVI. As the King of astronomers Ptolemy is proven to be a medieval phantom, therefore standing acquitted of the crime he was accused of by the late American astrophysicist Robert Newton. Allegedly ancient Egyptian horoscopes painted in Pharaoh’s tombs of the Valley of Kings or cut in stone in Dendera and Esna for centuries considered impenetrable are decoded at last! All dates contained therein turn out definitely medieval and pertain to the XI the earliest. Well, how old is ‘ancient’ Egypt actually? Discover highly interesting angles, chunky facts and updates to the biographies of the famous medieval astronomers Tycho Brahe and Copernicus. Reading this book resembles a test flight to the distant past returning with a conclusion: the past is eventually both drastically closer and dramatically different from one taught in school. Cover Overview of the seven volumes Title page About the authors Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko Contents From the Publishers Volume title page Foreword PART 1. THE DATING OF THE ALMAGEST Introduction Chapter 1. Some necessary information related to astronomy and history of astronomy Chapter 2. A preliminary analysis of the Almagest star catalogue Chapter 3. Unsuccessful attempts of dating the Almagest. Reasons for failure. Our new approach Chapter 4. Who is who? Chapter 5. The analysis of the star catalogues' systematic errors Chapter 6. Statistical and precision-related properties of the Almagest catalogue Chapter 7. The dating of the Almagest star catalogue. Statistical and geometrical methods Chapter 8.Tilt angle between the ecliptic and the equator in the Almagest Chapter 9. The application of our method to the dating of other mediaeval catalogues Chapter 10. Additional considerations concerning the dating of the Almagest. Stellar coverings and... Chapter 11. Other problems and hypotheses arising from the dating of the Almagest catalogue PART 2. THE DATING OF THE EGYPTIAN ZODIACS A foreword to Part 2 From the preface to The New Chronology of Egypt Chapter 12 The Egyptian zodiacs Chapter 13. Former astronomical datings of the Egyptian zodiacs Chapter 14. A new approach to the decipherment of the Egyptian zodiacs Chapter 15. The symbolism of the Egyptian zodiacs. A new and more complete interpretation Chapter 16. Astronomical estimation of the dates ciphered in the Egyptian zodiacs: a methodology Chapter 17. Dates ciphered in the monumental temple zodiacs of Dendera and Esna Chapter 18. Dates in zodiacs discovered inside Egyptian sepulchres Chapter 19. Dating results for Egyptian zodiacs ANNEXES Annex 1. Tables of fast and named stars of the Almagest that can be identified reliably Annex 2. The computer program of the geometrical method of dating of star configurations... Annex 3. The description of the Horos program used for the purposes of dating the Egyptian zodiacs Annex 4. Input data for the Horos program that yielded finite interpretation options Annex 5. Julian day numbers and the days of solstices and equinoxes... Annex 6. A list of solutions for the zodiacs from Athribis under less strict conditions Annex 7. A more precise drawn copy of the Greater Zodiac of Esna Annex 8. Our replies to the authors of certain erroneous works... Annex 9. Wikipedia Damage Control on New Chronology (Fomenko) page The complete bibliography to the seven volumes Back cover Dr.Prof Anatoly Fomenko and team dissect Almagest of ancient Ptolemy compiled allegedly in 150 a.d. and considered to be the corner stone of classical history. Their report Almagest was compiled in XVI-XVII cy from astronomical data of IX-XVI cy. As the King of astronomers Ptolemy is proven to be a medieval phantom, therefore standing aquitted of the crime he was accused by the late American astrophycist Robert Newton. Allegedly ancient Egyptian horoscopes painted in Pharaohs tombs of the Valley of Kings or cut in stone in Dendera and Esna for centuries considered impenetrable are decoded at last! All dates contained therein turn out definitely medieval and pertain to the XI cy a.d. the earliest. Well, how old is 'ancient' Egypt actually? Discover highly interesting angles, chunky facts and updates to the biographies of the famous medieval astronomers Tycho Brahe and Copernicus. Reading this book resembles a test flight to the distant past returning with a the past is eventually both drastically closer and dramatically different from one taught in school. Fasten your seatbelts, please. The publishers will pay a 10,000 dollars USA in cash to the first person who will not only declare but prove consistently, with adequate methods and in sufficient detail on the same or better academic level that the New Chronology theory of Full member of the Russian Academy of Science Dr Prof Anatoly T. Fomenko, Head of the Chair of the Differential Geometry of MSU and his team is wrong in their dating of Almagest. Not quite what you have learned in school? This version of events is more substantiated by hard facts and logic - validated by new astronomical research and statistical analysis of ancient sources - than everything you have read and heard about history before. The so-called consensual history is a finely woven magic fabric of intricate lies about events predating the XVI century. There is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that could be reliably and independently traced back earlier than the XI century. The archeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts are both non-exact and contradictory According to author Anatoly T. Fomenko, so-called consensual history is a finly woven magic fabric of intricate lies about events preceding the sixteenth century. There is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that can be reliably and independently traced back earlier than the sixteenth century. The archaeological, dedrochronological, paleographical, and carbon methods of dating ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact and contradictory. Nearly all of the methods of dating components are blatently untrue! This is a seven volume treatise on historical dating and scientific arguments regarding the truth or falsehoods in currently accepted historical concepts. It claims the 16th century as the time during which history was created by medieval scribes and cemented by the power of the ecclesial authorities. It is theorized for example that Jesus was actually born in 1053 A.D. and crucified in 1086 A.D.; the Old Testament refers to medieval events and the Apocalyse was written after 1486 A.D The author contends that all generaly accepted historical chronology prior to the 16th century is inaccurate, often off by many hundreds or even thousands of years. Volume 1 of a proposed seven volumes This series posits that all generally accepted chronology before the 16th century is wrong by hundreds if not thousands of years. Volume 3 of a proposed seven Let us recall that under the First Roman Empire we understand the "ancient" kingdom as founded by Romulus and Remus, presumably about 753 B.C. ([72]). The author posits that all generally accepted chronology before the 16th century is in error by hundreds or thousands of years