Hirohito and War : Imperial Tradition and Military Decision Making in Prewar Japan

The Debate Over Emperor Hirohito's Accountability For Government Decisions And Military Operations Up To The End Of World War Ii Began Before The End Of The War And Has Continued Even After His Death In 1989. Hirohito And War Documents This Controversy While Providing Insights Into The Showa Emperor's Role In Military Planning In Imperial Japan. It Argues That Hirohito Both Knew Of And Participated In Such Planning And Offers Evidence That He Was Informed Well In Advance Of Imperial Army And Navy Decisions, Including The Surprise Attack On Pearl Harbor. Using Japanese Primary Sources, Many Overlooked By Japanese And Western Historians, It Shows That Hirohito's Participation In The Decision-making Process Was Entirely Consistent With His Intellectual Background And His Passionate Belief In The Significance Of The Imperial Tradition For The Japanese Polity (kokutai) In Prewar Japan.--book Jacket. 1. Introduction -- 2. Imperial Navy Planning And The Emperor -- 3. Pearl Harbor And Decision Making -- 4. Tojo And The Emperor: Mutual Political Convictions -- 5. Scientism, History, And Confucianism: An Emperor's Education -- 6. Ancient Institutions And Foreign Cultures: New Interpretations For Modern Times -- 7. Hirohito's First Adviser: Count Makino Nobuaki -- 8. Conclusion. Peter Wetzler. Includes Bibliographical References (p. [269]-280) And Index. The debate over Emperor Hirohito's accountability for government decisions and military operations up to the end of the World War II began before the end of the war and has continued even after his death. This book documents this controversy while providing insights into the Showa emperor's role in military planning in imperial Japan. It argues that Hirohito both knew of and participated in such planning and offers evidence that he was informed well in advance of the planned attack on Pearl Harbor. Using Japanese primary sources, this text aims to show that Hirohito's participation in the decision-making process was entirely consistent with his intellectual background and his passionate belief in the significance of the imperial tradition for the Japanese polity (kokutai) in prewar Japan.