چکش میهن‌پرست: راهنمایی در زمینهٔ ضدتروریسم بلاغی

The striking paradox which becomes apparent when we're exposed to liberals and their discourse, is that on one hand they seem to always repeat the same simple nonsensical arguments and attacks, while on the other hand they have overwhelming success while debating nationalists and other enemies of Marxist thought. Why is it so hard for us to win debates against tape recorders stuck on “repeat"? Why can I turn on the television right now and see a liberal accusing a conservative of being “stuck in the 1950's", and be amazed that the conservative has no good answer to this tired cliche? The meat of this book is a catalog of liberal arguments – or “sound bites" – and examples of effective rebuttals. But the rebuttals have been carefully crafted, not to be logically bullet proof, but to place you in a more dominant position. The point is to punish their impertinence, not convince them of the error of their ways. Thus rebuttals will involve ridicule, scolding the liberal for the character flaws he is showing, showing how the liberal is the enemy of the public (peer pressure), pointing out how their ideas are fringe theories normal people don't subscribe to, and so on. And as much as possible, the rebuttals avoid complex explanations, use of statistics and studies, obscure examples the public is not familiar with, and of course apologies and justifications. Hammer of the Patriot is a small question and answer style format book on the topic of debating an anti-White.The book opens with an introductory chapter covering: The Purpose and Use of the Book, Judging the Situation, General Guidelines and Notes on the Arguments.The following chapters include sections on Ethnic Nationalism, Democracy, Freedom, Capitalism and Libertarianism, Use of Violence, Helping the Third World, Moral Relativism, Feminism/Natural Gender Roles, Religion in Society, Homosexuality, Human Rights, Racial Differences, Diversity, Jews, White Genocide, White Pride, General Attacks, Historical Questions, Christianity vs. Paganism, and Conspiracy Theories.In conclusion the book ends with 3 appendices: Rewarding the Opponent, Developing New Arguments, and finally Troubleshooting. Chapter I - Introduction Purpose and use of the book Judging the situation General guidelines Notes on the arguments Chapter II - Politics Ethnic Nationalism Democracy Freedom Capitalism and libertarianism Use of violence Helping the third world Chapter III - Society Moral relativism Feminism/natural gender roles Religion in society Homosexuality Human rights Chapter IV - Race Racial differences Diversity Jews White genocide White pride Chapter V - Miscellaneous General attacks Historical questions Christianity vs paganism Conspiracy theories Conclusion Appendix A - Rewarding the opponent Appendix B - Developing new arguments Appendix C - Troubleshooting