Habits for better vision : 20 scientifically proven ways to improve your eyesight naturally

A Fresh Perspective on Viewing Myopia. Myopia (nearsightedness) has become an epidemic, and is expected to affect nearly 5 billion people by 2050. When facing a myopia diagnosis, most people feel they have no choice but to get prescription lenses. But are glasses and contact lenses really the only solution? Is your myopia truly incurable? Are your genes problematic? No! Through scientifically proven facts, this book shows you how to change your beliefs, body, mind, environment, lifestyle, nutrition, and habits to prevent myopia and improve your eyesight holistically and naturally. It will show you how to: Jump start your journey towards better vision. Prevent myopia when your vision is perfect. Halt myopia progression or even reverse myopia naturally. Modify your lifestyle, nutrition, sleep, posture, habits, and behavior to improve your eyesight. Understand the role of stress, emotion, and mind in natural vision improvement. Harness the best prevention and cure of myopia—sunshine, nature and more. Form new daily habits and routines to promote your eye health and general well-being. John F. Kennedy said, “the best time to repair your roof is when the sun is shining.” The best time to prevent myopia is when your vision is perfect. But don’t lose hope if you already have myopia. “Where there is a will, there is a way.” This book will help you to find your “way” to return to your ideal vision. Considering the high incidence of myopia - and its inherent morbidit- it may wonder that the item is dealt with only sporadically in recent literature, and almost never at international conferences. However, there was a First International Conference on Myopia in New York 1964, and the Second was held in Yokohama 1978, affiliated to the XXIII World Congress of Ophthalmology. Here it was attempted to set out­ lines for future myopia research, and, as a practical implicaton, the arrange­ ment of the Third International Conference on Myopia was entrusted to Danish ophthalmolOgists. This conference took place in Copenhagen, August 24-27, 1980. To make the scope the widest possible, the conference was, as was the pre­ decessing in Japan, open not only to ophthalmologists, but'to all being active in the various aspects of myopia research'. The conference report gives a picture of the Copenhagen meeting. Furthermore, a platform or current status of myopia research has hereby been established. The editors have made it their main task to arrange the papers, and to bring them in a form suited for print, while criticism by editorial referees has been considered inappropriate. The papers give an impression of the ambiguity still prevailing in the field, and although't,rends'are obvious, a fmal consensus of Conference was not arrived at. To document this state of affairs, however, is considered a useful task. Considering the high incidence of myopia - and its inherent morbidit- it may wonder that the item is dealt with only sporadically in recent literature, and almost never at international conferences. However, there was a First International Conference on Myopia in New York 1964, and the Second was held in Yokohama 1978, affiliated to the XXIII World Congress of Ophthalmology. Here it was attempted to set out lines for future myopia research, and, as a practical implicaton, the arrange ment of the Third International Conference on Myopia was entrusted to Danish ophthalmolOgists. This conference took place in Copenhagen, August 24-27, 1980. To make the scope the widest possible, the conference was, as was the pre decessing in Japan, open not only to ophthalmologists, but 'to all being active in the various aspects of myopia research'. The conference report gives a picture of the Copenhagen meeting. Furthermore, a platform or current status of myopia research has hereby been established. The editors have made it their main task to arrange the papers, and to bring them in a form suited for print, while criticism by editorial referees has been considered inappropriate. The papers give an impression of the ambiguity still prevailing in the field, and although 't, rends' are obvious, a fmal consensus of Conference was not arrived at. To document this state of affairs, however, is considered a useful task