تعاملات فاشیستی: پیشنهادهایی برای رویکردی نو به فاشیسم و دوران آن، ۱۹۱۹-۱۹۴۵

Although Studies Of Fascism Have Constituted One Of The Most Fertile Areas Of Historical Inquiry In Recent Decades, More And More Scholars Have Called For A New Agenda With More Research Beyond Italy And Germany, Less Preoccupation With Definition And Classification, And More Sustained Focus On The Relationships Among Different Fascist Formations Before 1945. Starting From A Critical Assessment Of These Imperatives, This Rigorous Volume Charts A Historiographical Path That Transcends Rigid Distinctions While Still Developing Meaningful Criteria Of Differentiation. Even As We Take Fascism Seriously As A Political Phenomenon, Such An Approach Allows Us To Better Understand Its Distinctive Contradictions And Historical Variations--publisher's Website. Part I. Problems And Prospects -- New Restiveness, New Possibilities, And Unfinished Business In Fascist Studies -- Assessing The New Restiveness -- Transnational Turn, Unfinished Business, And Some Preliminary Categories And Distinctions -- Part Ii. Modes Of Epochal Interaction -- Internal Interaction : Fascists, Conservatives, And The Establishment -- Supranational Interaction Within The New Right -- Interaction With The Liberal Democracies -- Interaction Across The Left-right Divide And Uncertainty Over Totalitarianism -- Part Iii. Some Tentative Prescriptions -- Categories For Us : Blurring And Rigor -- Fascism As Epochal Or Continuing Possibility? David D. Roberts. Includes Bibliographical References And Index. La 4e de couverture indique : "Although studies of fascism have constituted one of the most fertile areas of historical inquiry in recent decades, more and more scholars have called for a new agenda with more research beyond Italy and Germany, less preoccupation with definition and classification, and more sustained focus on the relationships among different fascist formations before 1945. Starting from a critical assessment of these imperatives, this rigorous volume charts a historiographical path that transcends rigid distinctions while still developing meaningful criteria of differentiation. Even as we take fascism seriously as a political phenomenon, such an approach allows us to better understand its distinctive contradictions and historical variations." "Although studies of fascism have constituted one of the most fertile areas of historical inquiry in recent decades, more and more scholars have called for a new agenda with more research beyond Italy and Germany, less preoccupation with definition and classification, and more sustained focus on the relationships among different fascist formations before 1945. Starting from a critical assessment of these imperatives, this rigorous volume charts a historiographical path that transcends rigid distinctions while still developing meaningful criteria of differentiation. Even as we take fascism seriously as a political phenomenon, such an approach allows us to better understand its distinctive contradictions and historical variations"--From publisher's website.