Dividing Reality
معرفی کتاب «Dividing Reality» نوشتهٔ Eli Hirsch, 1938-، منتشرشده توسط نشر IRL Press at Oxford University Press در سال 1993. این کتاب در فرمت pdf، زبان انگلیسی ارائه شده است. «Dividing Reality» در دستهٔ بدون دستهبندی قرار دارد.
The central question in this book is why it seems reasonable for the words of our language to divide up the world in ordinary ways rather than other imaginable ways. Hirsch calls this the division problem. His book aims to bring this problem into sharp focus, to distinguish it from various related problems, and to consider the best prospects for solving it. In exploring various possible responses to the division problem, Hirsch examines series of "division principles" which purport to express rational constraints on how our words ought to classify and individuate. The ensuing discussion deals with a wide range of metaphysical and epistemological topics, including projectibility and similarity, alternative analyses of natural properties and things, the inscrutability of reference, and the relevance of such pragmatic notions as salience and economy. The final chapters of the book develop what Hirsch contends is the most promising response to the division problem: a theory in which constraints on classification and individuation are seen to derive from the necessary structure of "fine-grained" propositions and the necessary dependence of some concepts on others. The Central Question In This Book Is Why It Seems Reasonable For The Words Of Our Language To Divide Up The World In One Way Rather Than Another, Or What The Rational Basis Is For Our Language To Contain Certain Kinds Of General Words Rather Than Others. Terming This Query The Division Problem, Dividing Reality Aims To Bring It Into Sharp Focus, To Distinguish It From Various Related Problems, And To Consider The Best Prospects For Solving It. In Exploring Various Possible Responses To The Division Problem, Eli Hirsch Examines A Series Of Division Principles Which Purport To Express Rational Constraints On How Our Words Ought To Classify And Individuate. The Ensuing Discussion Deals With A Wide Range Of Metaphysical And Epistemological Topics, Including Projectibility And Similarity, Alternative Analyses Of Natural Properties And Things, The Inscrutability Of Reference, And The Relevance Of Such Pragmatic Notions As Salience And Economy. The Final Chapters Of The Book Develop What Hirsch Contends Is The Most Promising Response To The Division Problem: A Theory In Which Constraints On Classification And Individuation Are Seen To Derive From The Necessary Structure Of Fine-grained Propositions And The Necessary Dependence Of Some Concepts On Others. Formulating In Clear Terms A Fundamental Problem Which Has Not Been Properly Isolated Or Seriously Addressed Previously, This Book Is Of Key Interest To Metaphysicians, Philosophers Of Language, And Cognitive Psychologists. 1. The Division Problem. 1. Introduction To The Problem. 2. Classificatory And Individuative Strangeness. 3. Strange Languages And Strange Thoughts. 4. Further Examples Of Strangeness. 5. The Weight Of The Intuitions. 6. The Distinctness Of The Division Problem -- 2. Projectibility And Strange Languages. 1. Goodman's Problem And The Division Problem. 2. The Projectibility Principle. 3. Projectibility And Ostensive Learning. 4. Projectibility, Similarity, And Individuation -- 3. Reality's Joints I: Properties. 1. Reality's Joints And The Division Problem. 2. Natural Properties. 3. The Similarity Analysis. 4. The Causal Analysis. 5. Against Egalitarianism. 6. Degrees Of Naturalness. 7. Explanation And Classification -- 4. Reality's Joints Ii: Things. 1. Natural Things. 2. The Semantic Argument. 3. Inscrutability -- 5. The Pragmatic Response. 1. Extreme Relativism Versus Pragmatism. 2. Salience. 3. Important Properties And Things. 4. Economy. 5. The Pure Pragmatic Position -- 6. The Order Of Understanding. 1. The Impossibility Claim. 2. Concept-dependence Claims. 3. Fine-grained Propositions And Concept-dependence. 4. Derivation Of The Impossibility Claim. 5. A Solution To The Division Problem -- 7. Ontology And The Division Problem. 1. Ontology And The Order Of Understanding. 2. Soft And Hard Ontology. 3. Prospects For The Impossibility Claim. 4. Concluding Remarks -- Appendix 1. Projectible Terms. 1. Relative And Absolute Projectibility. 2. Which Terms Are Projectible? 3. Projectible Terms And Hypotheses. Appendix 2. Similarity And Natural Properties. 1. Quine's Similarity Condition. 2. Boundary Requirements. 3. Imperfect Community Reconsidered. 4. (n) And Complementary Properties. 5. The Problem Of Conjunctive Entailment -- Appendix 3. The Fine-grained Doctrine. 1. Fine-grained Propositions. 2. Analysis. 3. A Kripkean Problem For The Fine-grained Doctrine. 4. Fine-grained Properties. Eli Hirsch. Includes Bibliographical References (p. 236-239) And Index. Why does our language divide up reality one way rather than another? On what rational basis does our language contain certain kinds of general words rather than others? Hirsch shows that a language can be constructed which describes reality in ways we would find absurdly irrational, for example by classifying normally disparate items under the same general term. The apparent irrationality of the new language does not depend on its impoverished fact-stating power, as this may be equivalent to the fact-stating power of ordinary language; the problem then is to explain exactly what is wrong with it. Various options are explored and criticized, such as the hypothesis that language must reflect an underlying objective distinction between 'natural' kinds; that there are pragmatic reasons for the way language functions as it does; and that, as a matter of 'metaphysical necessity, ' strange ways of dividing up reality are constructions out of ordinary ways. Having demonstrated that this newly identified problem is in fact a serious one which cannot be easily solved or brushed aside, Hirsch offers his own suggestions for a possible solution. The author of this text identifies and explores a "new" philosophical problem referred to as "the division problem". Why does our language divide up reality in one way rather than another, and what is the rational basis for our language to contain certain kinds of general words rather than others?
دانلود کتاب Dividing Reality