Disputes And Democracy: The Consequences Of Litigation In Ancient Athens Consequences Of Litigation In Ancient Athens
معرفی کتاب «Disputes And Democracy: The Consequences Of Litigation In Ancient Athens Consequences Of Litigation In Ancient Athens» نوشتهٔ Steven Johnstone، منتشرشده توسط نشر University of Texas Press در سال 1999. این کتاب در 9 صفحه، فرمت pdf، زبان انگلیسی ارائه شده است.
This is an important study that will have a definite impact on the study of Athenian law and oratory. Johnstone's conclusions will not be accepted by everyone, but they are strongly argued and will have to be reckoned with by anyone who writes in this increasingly popular area.
Michael Gagarin, James R. Dougherty, Jr., Centennial Professor of Classics, University of Texas at Austin
Athenians performed democracy daily in their law courts. Without lawyers or judges, private citizens, acting as accusers and defendants, argued their own cases directly to juries composed typically of 201 to 501 jurors, who voted on a verdict without deliberation. This legal system strengthened and perpetuated democracy as Athenians understood it, for it emphasized the ideological equality of all (male) citizens and the hierarchy that placed them above women, children, and slaves.
This study uses Athenian court speeches to trace the consequences for both disputants and society of individuals' decisions to turn their quarrels into legal cases. Steven Johnstone describes the rhetorical strategies that prosecutors and defendants used to persuade juries and shows how these strategies reveal both the problems and the possibilities of language in the Athenian courts. He argues that Athenian law had no objective existence outside the courts and was, therefore, itself inherently rhetorical. This daring new interpretation advances an understanding of Athenian democracy that is not narrowly political, but rather links power to the practices of a particular institution.
Athenians performed democracy daily in their law courts. Without lawyers or judges, private citizens, acting as accusers and defendants, argued their own cases directly to juries composed typically of 201 to 501 jurors, who voted on a verdict without deliberation. This legal system strengthened and perpetuated democracy as Athenians understood it, for it emphasized the ideological equality of all (male) citizens and the hierarchy that placed them above women, children, and slaves.This study uses Athenian court speeches to trace the consequences for both disputants and society of individuals' decisions to turn their quarrels into legal cases. Steven Johnstone describes the rhetorical strategies that prosecutors and defendants used to persuade juries and shows how these strategies reveal both the problems and the possibilities of language in the Athenian courts. He argues that Athenian "law" had no objective existence outside the courts and was, therefore, itself inherently rhetorical. This daring new interpretation advances an understanding of Athenian democracy that is not narrowly political, but rather links power to the practices of a particular institution.
Acknowledgments 10 List of Abbreviations 14 Introduction 18 1. Authoritative Readings 38 2. Law and Narrative 63 3. Dare, or Truth 87 4. Conjuring Character 110 5. Certain Rituals 126 6. Litigation and Athenian Culture 143 Appendix: The Use of Statistics 151 Notes 155 Bibliography 196 Index 206 Index of Passages Cited 213