آیا اصلاح‌طلبان به اشتباه پولس را تفسیر کردند؟: نقد تاریخی-الهیاتی چشم‌انداز جدید

In this study, Aaron O'Kelley argues that the 'new perspective' on Paul rests on a faulty hermeneutical presupposition, namely, that covenantal nomism could not have served as a foil for Paul in the development of a doctrine of justification that resembles that of the Reformation. COMMENDATIONS "Carefully researched and argued, Aaron O'Kelley's monograph offers a refreshing engagement of New Testament scholarship from the perspective of historical and systematic theology." - Kevin W. McFadden, Cairn University, USA By placing the Reformation doctrine of justification in its historical-theological context against the backdrop of late medieval Catholic theology, O'Kelley demonstrates that the real nature of the debate between Rome and the reformers was not grace vs. good works per se but rather the Reformation's clear law-gospel distinction vs. Rome's law-gospel synthesis. This study seeks to allow the reformers and their heirs a fair hearing in the current debate over Paul's doctrine of justification, a courtesy that they have too often been denied. --Book cover