Britannia's Embrace : Modern Humanitarianism and the Imperial Origins of Refugee Relief

On The Eve Of The American Revolution, The Refugee Was, According To British Tradition, A Protestant Who Sought Shelter From Continental Persecution. By The Turn Of The Twentieth Century, However, British Refuge Would Be Celebrated Internationally As Being Open To All Persecuted Foreigners. Britain Had Become A Haven For Fugitives As Diverse As Karl Marx And Louis Napoleon, Simón Bolívar And Frederick Douglass. How And Why Did The Refugee Category Expand? How, In A Period When No Law Forbade Foreigners Entry To Britain, Did The Refugee Emerge As A Category For Humanitarian And Political Action? Why Did The Plight Of These Particular Foreigners Become Such A Characteristically British Concern? Current Understandings About The Origins Of Refuge Have Focused On The Period After 1914. Britannia's Embrace Offers The First Historical Analysis Of The Origins Of This Modern Humanitarian Norm In The Long Nineteenth Century. At A Time When Britons Were Reshaping Their Own Political Culture, This Charitable Endeavor Became Constitutive Of What It Meant To Be Liberal On The Global Stage. Like British Anti-slavery, Its Sister Movement, Campaigning On Behalf Of Foreign Refugees Seemed To Give Purpose To The Growing Empire And The Resources Of Empire Gave It Greater Strength. By The Dawn Of The Twentieth Century, British Efforts On Behalf Of Persecuted Foreigners Declined Precipitously, But Its Legacies In Law And In Modern Humanitarian Politics Would Be Long-lasting. In Telling This Story, Britannia's Embrace Puts Refugee Relief Front And Center In Histories Of Human Rights And International Law And Of Studies Of Britain In The World. In So Doing, It Describes The Dynamic Relationship Between Law, Resources, And Moral Storytelling That Remains Critical To Humanitarianism Today-- Introduction: Britannia's Embrace -- Part I. The Rise Of Liberal Refuge -- Catholic Émigrés And The Protestant Nation -- The Consolation Of Refuge -- Telling Stories, Taking Action -- Taking Refuge In Empire -- Colonial Refuge In The Metropolitan Eye -- Part Ii. A National Tradition Or A Universal Right? : Refuge And The Law -- Heroes, Villains, And The Parameters Of Political Asylum -- Probing The Limits Of Imperial Humanitarianism -- Hardening The Humanitarian Heart -- Conclusion: Moral Politics And The Quest For A Language Of Right. Caroline Shaw. Includes Bibliographical References And Index. "On the eve of the American Revolution, the refugee was, according to British tradition, a Protestant who sought shelter from continental persecution. By the turn of the twentieth century, however, British refuge would be celebrated internationally as being open to all persecuted foreigners. Britain had become a haven for fugitives as diverse as Karl Marx and Louis Napoleon, Simón Bolívar and Frederick Douglass. How and why did the refugee category expand? How, in a period when no law forbade foreigners entry to Britain, did the refugee emerge as a category for humanitarian and political action? Why did the plight of these particular foreigners become such a characteristically British concern? Current understandings about the origins of refuge have focused on the period after 1914. Britannia's Embrace offers the first historical analysis of the origins of this modern humanitarian norm in the long nineteenth century. At a time when Britons were reshaping their own political culture, this charitable endeavor became constitutive of what it meant to be liberal on the global stage. Like British anti-slavery, its sister movement, campaigning on behalf of foreign refugees seemed to give purpose to the growing empire and the resources of empire gave it greater strength. By the dawn of the twentieth century, British efforts on behalf of persecuted foreigners declined precipitously, but its legacies in law and in modern humanitarian politics would be long-lasting. In telling this story, Britannia's Embrace puts refugee relief front and center in histories of human rights and international law and of studies of Britain in the world. In so doing, it describes the dynamic relationship between law, resources, and moral storytelling that remains critical to humanitarianism today"-- Provided by publisher On the eve of the American Revolution, the refugee was, according to British tradition, a Protestant who sought shelter from continental persecution. By the turn of the twentieth century, however, British refuge would be celebrated internationally as being open to all persecuted foreigners. Britain had become a haven for fugitives as diverse as Karl Marx and Louis Napoleon, Simon Bolivar and Frederick Douglass. How and why did the refugee category expand? How, in a period when no law forbade foreigners entry to Britain, did the refugee emerge as a category for humanitarian and political action? Why did the plight of these particular foreigners become such a characteristically British concern? Current understandings about the origins of refuge have focused on the period after 1914. Britannia's Embrace offers the first historical analysis of the origins of this modern humanitarian norm in the long nineteenth century. At a time when Britons were reshaping their own political culture, this charitable endeavor became constitutive of what it meant to be liberal on the global stage. Like British anti-slavery, its sister movement, campaigning on behalf of foreign refugees seemed to give purpose to the growing empire and the resources of empire gave it greater strength. By the dawn of the twentieth century, British efforts on behalf of persecuted foreigners declined precipitously, but its legacies in law and in modern humanitarian politics would be long-lasting. In telling this story, Britannia's Embrace puts refugee relief front and center in histories of human rights and international law and of studies of Britain in the world. In so doing, it describes the dynamic relationship between law, resources, and moral storytelling that remains critical to humanitarianism today. " Cover Copyright Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Britannia’s Embrace Part I The Rise of Liberal Refuge One Catholic Émigrés and the Protestant Nation ⋅ Two The Consolation of Refuge Three Telling Stories, Taking Action Four Taking Refuge in Empire Five Colonial Refuge in the Metropolitan Eye ⋅ Part II A National Tradition or a Universal Right? Refuge and the Law Six Heroes, Villains, and the Parameters of Political Asylum Seven The Limits of Imperial Humanitarianism Eight Hardening the Humanitarian Heart Conclusion: Moral Politics and the Quest for a Language of Right Notes Select Bibliography Index