Affective Politics Of The Global Event: Trauma And The Resilient Market Subject (ripe Series In Global Political Economy)

Market life is increasingly conducted in the shadow of global events like 9/11, the Sub-Prime crisis and Brexit. Within International political economy (IPE) two broad positions can be discerned: either the event is ‘just an event’, a superficial spectacle in an otherwise straightforward story of power and hierarchy; or the event is large enough to be considered a ‘crisis’. While sympathetic to such arguments, this book develops a more performative politics of the global event, arguing that the very idea of the event must be placed in question. How is the event constructed? How are market subjects performed in relation to the event? This book argues that emotional and psychological discourses of ‘trauma’ and ‘resilience’ provide an important affective register for understanding how the global event is ‘known’, how it is governed, and how the affective dimensions of market life might be lived. By identifying the contingent rise of these discourses, the author de-stabilises and re-politicises the apparent existential veracity of the global event. The critical possibilities and limits of the affective turn in market life can then be rendered according to classic questions of IPE: who wins, who loses, and how might it be changed? An important work for advanced scholars and students of international political economy, ‘everyday and cultural political economy’, crisis and resilience, as well as broader debates on globalisation. "Market life is increasingly conducted in the shadow of global events like 9/11, the Sub-Prime crisis and Brexit. Within International political economy (IPE) two broad positions can be discerned: either the event is just an event, a superficial spectacle in an otherwise straightforward story of power and hierarchy; or the event is large enough to be considered a crisis. While sympathetic to such arguments, this book develops a more performative politics of the global event, arguing that the very idea of the event must be placed in question. How is the event constructed? How are market subjects performed in relation to the event? This book argues that emotional and psychological discourses of trauma and resilience provide an important affective register for understanding how the global event is known, how it is governed, and how the affective dimensions of market life might be lived. By identifying the contingent rise of these discourses, the author de-stabilises and re-politicises the apparent existential veracity of the global event. The critical possibilities and limits of the affective turn in market life can then be rendered according to classic questions of IPE: who wins, who loses, and how might it be changed?An important work for advanced scholars and students of international political economy, everyday and cultural political economy, crisis and resilience, as well as broader debates on globalisation."--Provided by publisher A contribution to the growing field of everyday and cultural political economy that foregrounds the role of everyday market subjects and cultural practices in IPE. A good third of the book is dedicated to the re-politicisation of trauma and resilience so as to recover and enhance the potential agency of market subjects. Distinct from the arguments of previous works on the subject in two main ways; 1) emplaces the dynamic of the global event and portrays the contingent emergence of the affective turn as an ethical achievement per se: something which people have argued for, debated, adjusted, or modified over time and in response to criticism; and thus 2) by recognising the contingency and malleability of affect, argues that the potential for intervention, resistance, and agency of market subjects is far greater than might be supposed. This book develops a performative politics of the global event, providing a route into understanding and interpreting the possibilities and limits of the affective turn in market life and holds implications for the classic questions of IPE: who wins, who loses, and how might it be changed?.